According to nine experts in the radiofrequency (RF) radiation field, 5G RF radiation can cause brain damage and even lead to issues like dementia and Alzheimer’s disease.
The peer-reviewed article was published in the journal Annals of Clinical and Medical Case Reports.
The researchers urged the authorities to listen to other experts from the RF scientific community by establishing a “more stringent regulatory framework” on RF radiation and postponing the rollout of 5G technologies, along with smart meters and 5G cell towers, until “qualified scientists independent of industry” have had enough time to thoroughly review the risks of the technology.
It’s time for an “ethical discussion” on 5G
Mona Nilsson, the lead author of the article and managing director of the Swedish Radiation Protection Foundation, described the situation as “absurd.”
While the first two studies published on 5G’s effects on humans and animals reported serious negative side effects, government authorities and telecom companies kept putting up 5G cell towers and smart meters near people’s homes.
Dr. Lennart Hardell, a co-author of the article and a respected scientist on cancer risks from radiation, warned that it is time to “have an ethical discussion” about 5G and RF radiation. Hardell has also written over 100 papers on non-ionizing radiation.
Hardell questioned what kind of society the country has, where the government willingly exposes citizens to hazardous pollution in their own homes without any chance of escape.
From an ethical point of view, this is a “very problematic societal situation.” Despite the growing body of research on 5G and its adverse effects on human health, the government continues to ignore the data.
Hardell, Nilsson and their co-authors are leaders of independent organizations in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden that study RF radiation.
The research team reported that the first study on 5G’s adverse effects revealed how people experienced different symptoms, such as:
- Concentration problems
- Confusion
- Dizziness
- Fatigue
- Heart and lung symptoms
- Heart palpitations
- Impaired short-term memory
- Severe sleep disturbances
- Skin complaints
- Tendency toward depression
- Tinnitus
Reports showed that people experienced these negative symptoms only days after a 5G cell tower was installed above their apartments.
Data from the second 5G study revealed that rats exposed to 5G had an increased incidence of damage to neurons and increased oxidative stress in the brain. (Related: 5G rollout must be stopped to avoid widespread exposure to EMF and RF radiation.)
The adverse effects observed in these animal subjects could eventually led to degenerative brain diseases, such as dementia, Alzheimer’s and other neurological diseases, warned the researchers.
If you are worried that you are at risk of developing Alzheimer’s, making lifestyle changes like following a balanced diet can help. But no matter how much you exercise to maintain a healthy weight, the risk will still be there if you live near 5G cell towers.
Nilsson added that other earlier studies prove the adverse effects of RF radiation on the brain and nervous system.
A compilation by Henry Lai, professor emeritus of bioengineering at the University of Washington, showed that at least 244 studies between 2007 and 2022 have proven the negative neurological effects of RF radiation, said Nilsson.
She added that despite the glut of scientific research and researchers clamoring to be heard, nothing is being done to ensure public health because “those institutions that have influenced the authorities … are captured by the industry.”
Hardell and Rainer Nyberg, co-author and a professor emeritus of education and welfare studies at Abo Akademi University in Finland, launched the 5G Appeal in 2017.
The appeal encouraged policymakers to halt 5G deployment because of serious human health consequences. If enforced, the appeal will give researchers with no ties to the industry enough time to investigate any potential risks.
As of Jan. 10, 430 medical doctors and scientists from across the globe have signed the 5G Appeal.
Authorities continue to ignore evidence of health risks
The research team emphasized that even though there is an increasing number of scientific evidence of many harmful effects, authorities “ignore the increasing evidence of clear risks.”
For example, regulatory authorities insist that current guidelines are enough to protect citizens from harm.
However, the same authorities depend on a “limited group of experts” who are not representative of the scientific community at large to support their position.
And suspiciously enough, many of these same experts are linked to the telecom companies that will benefit from the harmful technology.
To fix this problem, the authors suggest forming a new committee made up of qualified scientists independent of the industry for “a sound scientific evaluation of 5G.”
5G Rollout violates human rights
Data show that 5G RF radiation already exceed levels known to be harmful to human life and wildlife. According to the study authors, it is “a violation of human rights to impose this harmful radiation on people in their own homes without their informed consent.”
However, Hardell doubts regulatory authorities would listen to their advice because the telecom industry and politicians have already convinced themselves that there is nothing to worry about.
Hardell noted that their research and the 5G Appeal are important evidence of how researchers like him have warned about the severe health effects of 5G. The case reports published by Hardell and Nilsson on 5G’s effects also show that people had no other choice but to abandon their homes to get relief from their symptoms.
Hardell is concerned about those who are not financially capable of relocating to improve their health conditions.
Visit 5GAlert.com for more information about the negative side effects of 5G and RF radiation.
Watch the video below to learn how 5G technology can penetrate the human blood-brain barrier.
This video is from the NoVaxx channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- Crime against humanity: 5G is a weapons deployment system masquerading as a communications enhancement.
- New study links cell phone radiation to Alzheimer’s disease.
- Wireless radiation from mobile devices causing REAL HARM to people.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.