“They lied to me about Covid and the jabs from the beginning,” Donald Trump says in the imaginary scenario I’ve concocted in my head. “Today, I officially denounce the Covid-19 vaccines and I apologize for touting them the last two-and-a-half years.”
That’s what I want him to say. I wish he would have said something to that effect already. The evidence is crystal clear. The powers-that-be and their minions that were placed in his administration have been lying from the start, manipulating him through his inherent desire for action against a perceived problem. Now, he has the tough choice of either going back on his claims that he saved tens or even hundreds of millions of lives or sticking to his guns with the narrative that the vaccines were good but mandates were bad.
Unfortunately, he’s not alone with his Covid vaccine baggage. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis, his biggest threat on the Republican side, has his own history of promoting the vaccines and lockdowns. He has tried to slowly reverse his perspectives but his history will weigh on him unless he, too, comes out with a full-throated condemnation of the jabs. He’s in better position than President Trump on the issue, but not by much.
The only major candidate to unambiguously condemn the jabs has been Democrat Robert F. Kennedy Jr. He’s been saying a lot of good things lately, but he comes with a completely different set of baggage. As a Democrat, he embraces policies that make supporting him untenable for most America First patriots. On the other side of the fence, some of his more Libertarian views make him a non-starter for radical progressives.
He’s the oddest of candidates with extreme views that make him hard for the murky middle to swallow. Outside of those who see the jabs as the only voting consideration, I’m not sure how he could build a strong enough base to defeat a sitting president, even one as unpopular as Joe Biden.
If Biden were to fall before the primaries for whatever reason, the DNC would bring in someone more controllable like California Governor Gavin Newsom or Michelle Obama. They won’t embrace someone so triggering as RFK Jr any more than they would embrace someone like Bernie Sanders.
That brings us back to President Trump. I desperately want him to denounce the jabs because it would make supporting him easier. I’m seeking simplicity at this point, not perfection. It’s easier for me than most people to not be so invested in presidential campaign politics because I’m a firm believer that only God can correct the disastrous course our nation is on, and only We the People can solve our problems, not politicians. With that said, I’m rooting for Trump to become the strongest possible opposition to globalism, transhumanism, and the Deep State.
Until he denounces the jabs, he cannot properly oppose globalism. He cannot oppose transhumanism. He can’t even properly oppose the Deep State. All three have been reliant on the promotion of the jabs and the dissemination of Pandemic Panic Theater to achieve their goals. On top of that, the likelihood of another “Plandemic” rises every day so we need someone in the White House who is at least skeptical if not adamantly opposed to everything the medical powers-that-be put forth.
Is anyone still reading or did I run off everyone already?
Trump supporters will say he’s taking a mulligan on his support of the jabs and that everything else is fine. DeSantis supporters will say he has at least been skeptical of the efficacy and safety of the jabs and therefore he’s closer to the truth. RFK Jr supporters will say the jabs are the biggest issue and we should ignore his leftist policies.
Everyone’s right and everyone’s wrong. And therein lies my dilemma. It all becomes a lot simpler if Trump comes to his senses, fires his advisors, and admits the jabs are killing more people than they’re helping.
Join the discussion about this topic on my Substack.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.