(Mises)—The Federal Reserve’s Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) on Wednesday left the target policy interest rate (the federal funds rate) unchanged at 5.5 percent. This “pause” in the target rate suggests the FOMC believes it has raised the target rate high enough to rein in price inflation which has run well above the Fed’s arbitrary two-percent inflation target since mid-2021.
The press release from the FOMC was largely unchanged from previous recent meetings and contained the usual language about the state of the economy and the Fed’s ability to manage it:
Recent indicators suggest that economic activity has been expanding at a solid pace. Job gains have slowed in recent months but remain strong, and the unemployment rate has remained low. Inflation remains elevated. … The U.S. banking system is sound and resilient. … the Committee will continue reducing its holdings of Treasury securities and agency debt and agency mortgage-backed securities, as described in its previously announced plans.
This rosy and orderly picture of the situation relies on cherry-picking which indicators on which to base an assessment of the overall economy, and in his post-meeting press conference, Fed Chair Jerome Powell repeated the usual stock language the committee routinely provides on how present high labor demand proves there is no economic turbulence on the horizon. This reliance on current jobs data deliberately hides a larger and more accurate assessment of the economy. Nonetheless, in his comments at the press conference, Powell stated some undeniable facts:
Inflation remains well above our longer-run goal of 2 percent—4 percent over the 12 months ending in August—and that, excluding the volatile food and energy categories, core PCE prices rose 3.9 percent. Inflation has moderated somewhat since the middle of last year … Nevertheless, the progress—the process of getting inflation sustainably down to 2 percent has a long way to go.
This meeting of the FOMC was described as “hawkish” by Wall Street observers and pundits, mainly because the FOMC’s Summary of Economic Projections (SEP) suggested that the target inflation rate will remain at 5.5 percent—or even slightly higher—throughout the rest of the year. As Powell noted:
If the economy evolves as projected the median participant projects that the appropriate level of the federal-funds rate will be 5.6 percent at the end of this year, 5.1 percent at the end of 2024, and 3.9 percent at the end of 2025. Compared with our June Summary of Economic Projections, the median projection is unrevised for the end of this year but is moved up by a half percentage point at the end of the next two years.
If we read between the lines, it is apparent that the Fed is hoping that price inflation will fall to politically acceptable levels without any additional tightening, and without a recession. But “hope” is all the Fed has. The FOMC voting members have no idea what comes next. But, the members apparently still fear politically damaging price inflation isn’t going away as evidenced by most members’ admission that the target rate is unlikely to fall much before the end of 2024. This is notable because the FOMC members tend to strenuously avoid any predictions that rates might tighten further.
A look at the past three years of SEPs shows very little upward movement in target rates. Moreover, in 2021, Fed personnel were insisting with the utmost confidence that the target rate would not increase at all until late 2023. In reality, the Fed was forced to raise rates in 2022 as price inflation soared to 40-year highs. The Fed’s misplaced confidence in 2021 that low rates would endure all relied on a false narrative that price inflation would be either nonexistent or—at most—would be transitory. Fed economists were either lying or were utterly wrong about the state of price inflation. So, if Fed personnel have failed so miserably at predicting price inflation in recent years is there reason to now believe that the Fed now has the situation in hand? No.
The Fed Forced Rates to Ultra-Low Levels for a Very Long Time
Nonetheless, the current narrative about the “hawkish” Fed is that it has slayed the price-inflation beast and that the Fed has allowed interest rates to rise to the “correct” level. Some even claim that the target rate is too high.
Much has been said of how the target federal funds rate is now at the highest it’s been since 2001. Yet, it is important to consider the cumulative effects of ultra-low-interest rate policy that proceeded the recent rate-hiking schedule. The fact is that beginning in late 2007, the Federal Reserve began a policy of forcing down interest rates for a very prolonged period that lasted until 2018. During this period, the target policy interest rate was consistently well below the CPI inflation rate. This produced a negative-value “gap” between the target interest rate and the CPI inflation rate. Then, from 2020 to 2023, this gap was driven deep into negative territory to levels not seen since the mid-1970s.
Indeed, the only period rivaling this post-2008 easy-money policy is the period of the mid-1970s which ended in the historical periods of high inflation experienced during the late 1970s and early 1980s.
The current target rate must be interpreted in light of the long duration of the easy-money years that came before today’s rate-raising trend given. During this period, easy-money fueled bubbles and malinvestments grew for fifteen years. Such immense amounts of monetary inflation cannot be “fixed” with a few months of 5-to-6 percent interest rates.
The long period of ultra-low rates we’ve seen over the past 15 years is a clear historical aberration and the product of a central bank seeking to force down interest rates again and again. Evidence of this can be seen in the Fed’s turn toward purchasing trillions of dollars worth of government debt and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) since 2008. The effect has been to drive down interest on Treasurys and create artificial demand for MBS to prop up commercial banks. An enormous bubble in asset prices—i.e., asset-price inflation—has been one result.
After so long a period, a “cure” for such enormous imbalances in the economy will not be engineered with a “soft landing.”
The claim that interest rates are “high,” of course, are unsupportable so long as the central bank replaces market interest rates with artificial central-bank-manipulated interest rates. The Fed has no idea what the “natural interest rate” is or what market interest rates would be in the absence of the central bank’s incessant interventions. So, it is impossible to say what the “correct” target rate is. Of course, it is safe to assume market rates would be higher than the current policy rate. If market rates would be actually lower than the current target policy rate, then there would be no “need”—”need” as perceived by central bankers—for the FOMC to manipulate rates downward as it is clearly trying to do.
At the First Sign of Trouble, Rates Will Head Down Again
The FOMC’s SEP shows that the target interest rate will remain above 5 percent, even to the end of 2024. There is no telling if the polled FOMC members actually believe this, but it is extremely unlikely that the target rate will remain anywhere near five percent if the employment situation worsens to the point it becomes a political liability for the current regime.
Over the past 30-plus years, the central bank has consistently forced interest rates downward every time high unemployment and recession become evident to the public. Thus, it is likely the FOMC has already maxed out its target rate for this cycle. Yes, the FOMC has only “paused” the rate hikes, meaning it could conceivably move them higher in the near future. For cynical veteran Fed watchers, however, the pause immediately raises the question of whether or not the pause will be followed in, say, six months by a drop in the target interest rate. After all, historical experience shows that when the Fed “pauses” it rarely goes back to any sort of sustained period of monetary tightening.
Over the past thirty years, there have only been a few occasions during which the Fed paused for more than a single month, and then went back to allowing the target rate to move upward again. This occurred briefly in 2017, and in 1996 and 1997. In the quantitative tightening period between the Dot-com Bust and the Great Recession, however, the Fed never “paused” longer than a single month. If the Fed fails to allow rates to climb again next month, we’ll have good reason to suspect that the Fed is done with this current round of rate hikes.
The last decade has shown us that the Fed clings to a bias very much in favor of ramming down interest rates again and again. This is what happened in the ten years of near-zero rates that followed the 2008 financial crisis. Every month, the FOMC would come out and say that the economy was “growing” and was showing “strength” yet repeatedly refused to raise rates. In our current predicament, the Fed is afraid of price inflation, but is also afraid to raise rates even further, even as the August CPI data showed rates ticked upward again. Political expedience demands that the Fed do what it can to rein in price inflation without triggering sizable increases in unemployment. The Fed is holding the current rate steady because politics demands it.
Read More: “Yes, the Fed Really Is Holding Down Interest Rates” by Joseph Salerno.
About the Author
Ryan McMaken (@ryanmcmaken) is executive editor at the Mises Institute. Send him your article submissions for the Mises Wire and Power and Market, but read article guidelines first. Ryan has a bachelor’s degree in economics and a master’s degree in public policy and international relations from the University of Colorado. He was a housing economist for the State of Colorado. He is the author of Breaking Away: The Case of Secession, Radical Decentralization, and Smaller Polities and Commie Cowboys: The Bourgeoisie and the Nation-State in the Western Genre.
Why Bullion Beats Numismatics and Collectible for Your Safe or IRA
Precious metals continue to attract Americans seeking reliable ways to protect their wealth amid inflation, geopolitical risks, and stock market swings. Whether stored in a home safe or held inside a self-directed IRA, physical gold and silver deliver tangible value that paper or digital assets often lack. Yet investors must choose carefully between bullion—pure bars and coins valued mainly for their metal content—and numismatics or collectibles, where rarity, history, and collector demand heavily influence pricing.
Advisor Bullion serves as a dependable source for straightforward, high-quality bullion. The company specializes in physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, emphasizing transparent pricing and products that deliver maximum metal content for every dollar spent. This approach makes it ideal for both personal holdings and retirement accounts.
Bullion consists of refined precious metals in standard forms like one-ounce coins (American Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs) or bars. Their value tracks closely to the current spot price of the metal. A typical gold bullion coin trades near the live gold spot price plus a small premium. This structure keeps costs clear and predictable.
Numismatic coins and collectibles add substantial value from factors such as age, rarity, minting errors, or historical significance. A pre-1933 U.S. gold coin or graded proof piece can carry premiums of 30%, 50%, or even 200% above melt value. While this appeals to hobbyists, it creates complexity. Pricing depends on subjective grading, collector trends, and auction results instead of daily spot prices.
For investors focused on wealth preservation and retirement security rather than building a collection, bullion often delivers better results.
Lower Costs and Better Liquidity for Home Storage
When keeping metals in a home safe or private vault, liquidity and efficiency count. Bullion offers clear benefits:
- You acquire more actual gold or silver per dollar invested. Numismatics divert a large share of your money into rarity premiums and massive sales commission, reducing your metal exposure.
- Selling bullion involves tight bid-ask spreads, so you recover nearly full spot value with minimal fees. Collectibles require finding the right buyer and may sell at a discount if demand for that specific item weakens.
- Bullion prices remain transparent and update with global spot markets. You can track gold near current levels or silver accordingly and know exactly where your holdings stand. Numismatic values are priced by the Gold IRA companies with hefty margins applied.
- Standardized coins and bars store efficiently and divide easily for partial sales. Rare coins often need protective slabs and controlled conditions, adding hassle and expense.
- Bullion enjoys worldwide acceptance. A 1-oz Gold Maple Leaf or Silver Eagle sells quickly to dealers anywhere. Niche numismatic pieces may appeal only to limited buyers, slowing liquidation when speed matters.
In times when quick access to value becomes important, bullion’s simplicity stands out.
Stronger Fit for Precious Metals IRAs
Precious metals IRAs continue gaining traction as investors diversify retirement portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. IRS rules permit certain bullion products in self-directed IRAs if they meet purity standards (.995 fine for gold, .999 for silver) and are held by an approved custodian. Eligible items include American Gold and Silver Eagles plus many generic bars and rounds from recognized mints.
Numismatic and most collectible coins generally face heavy scrutiny from custodians due to valuation disputes and elevated markups. These higher premiums mean less actual metal ends up working inside the account.
Bullion avoids these issues. Its value links directly to verifiable spot prices, which simplifies reporting and lowers the risk of regulatory challenges. More of your IRA contribution purchases real metal instead of dealer profits or speculative upside. Over time, owning additional ounces that appreciate with the metal itself can create meaningful outperformance compared with high-premium alternatives that deliver fewer ounces.
Regulatory guidance from the CFTC and state securities offices repeatedly cautions against aggressive sales of expensive numismatics or “semi-numismatic” coins for IRAs. For retirement planning, transparent bullion from established providers reduces risk and aligns better with long-term goals.
How to Get Started with Bullion
Begin by clarifying your goals. Are you protecting savings in a safe, or moving part of a retirement account into a precious metals IRA? Focus on the number of ounces you can acquire at current prices rather than chasing marked-up collectibles.
Diversify sensibly: use gold for core preservation and silver for its blend of industrial and monetary qualities. Mix coins for easier divisibility with bars for lower per-ounce costs on larger buys. Arrange secure storage—whether at home with proper insurance or through professional facilities.
As economic uncertainties linger and faith in conventional assets erodes, bullion continues proving its worth as a dependable store of value. Its direct approach avoids the hype that sometimes surrounds collectible markets and keeps the focus on the metal itself.
For investors prepared to strengthen their portfolios, Advisor Bullion supplies the expertise and selection needed to acquire high-quality bullion efficiently. Whether building personal holdings or integrating metals into an IRA, their emphasis on transparent, investment-grade products helps secure more ounces today that support greater financial security tomorrow. In a complicated financial landscape, bullion’s clarity and reliability make it the smarter foundation for protecting what matters most.