Editor’s Note: Generally we do not celebrate coming hardship for anyone. Americans will be affected by this if The Economic Ninja and Zero Hedge are correct. With that said, bad coffee by a woke company could only head in the negative direction eventually. That eventuality may be upon them. Here’s Tyler Durden at Zero Hedge for more…
Starbucks shares plummeted by 16% during the early cash session, approaching the -16.2% level last seen during the Covid crash. If intraday losses surpass 16.2% and remain above this level at closing, it would mark the company’s worst single-day loss since the Dot Com crash in early 2000.
“Starbucks reported what’s perhaps the worst set of results of any large company so far” this quarter, analyst Adam Crisafulli of Vital Knowledge wrote in a note. William Blair downgraded the coffee chain, citing last quarter’s “stunning across-the-board miss on all key metrics.”
Starbucks reported a 4% drop in same-store sales in the second quarter compared with the same period last year, while analysts tracked by Bloomberg were expecting growth. In China, same-store sales plunged 11%. The company’s top geographic segments are showing a pullback in consumer spending.
On Tuesday evening, CEO Laxman Narasimhan started the earnings call with investors by clarifying his unhappiness with last quarter’s results.
“Let me be clear from the beginning. Our performance this quarter was disappointing and did not meet our expectations,” Narasimhan said.
He said major headwinds originate from a “cautious consumer,” adding, “A deteriorating economic outlook has weighed on customer traffic and impact felt broadly across the industry.”
Here’s a snapshot of the second quarter’s earnings results (list courtesy of Bloomberg):
- Comparable sales -4%, estimate +1.46% (Bloomberg Consensus)
- North America comparable sales -3%, estimate +2.05%
- US comparable sales -3%, estimate +2.31%
- International comparable sales -6%, estimate +1.36%
- China comparable sales -11%, estimate -1.62%
- Adjusted EPS 68c, estimate 80c
- Net revenue $8.56 billion, estimate $9.13 billion
- Operating income $1.10 billion, -17% y/y, estimate $1.35 billion
- Adjusted operating margin 12.8%, estimate 14.5%
- Operating margin 12.8%, estimate 14.4%
- North America operating margin +18%, estimate +19.5%
- International operating margin 13.3%, estimate 15.2%
- Channel development operating margin 51.7%, estimate 43.6%
- Average ticket +2%, estimate +2.41%
- North American average ticket price +4%, estimate +4.15%
- International avg. ticket -3%, estimate +0.1%
- North America net new stores 134, estimate 144.33
- International net new store openings 230, estimate 429.23
- Comparable transactions -6%, estimate -0.27%
- North America comparable transactions -7%, estimate -1.86%
- International comparable transactions -3%, estimate +1.37%
Goldman analysts Eric Mihelc and Scott Feiler told clients, “Expectations were for a clear sales miss and a modest EPS miss, but both came worse than the lowered bar.”
They added, “The miss was across geography and was as bad, if not worse, than worst fears.”
Other Wall Street analysts shared the same gloom and doom about the coffee chain (list courtesy of Bloomberg):
Deutsche Bank analyst Lauren Silberman cuts Starbucks to hold from buy
- Says the “challenging” results was a sign “headwinds are more pervasive and persistent than we expected, and we have limited visibility into the pace and magnitude of a recovery”
- Had thought comparable sales deceleration in the US was more transitory and isolated to a specific cohort
- However, with the decline in 2Q traffic and what seems to be limited improvement from Lavender and Spicy Refreshers, Silberman sees it being difficult to “underwrite a meaningful reacceleration,” which is key to the bull case
William Blair, Sharon Zackfia (cuts to market perform from outperform)
- After healthy demand over the past three years, Zackfia says the “tide has turned quickly,” with Starbucks posting the weakest traffic performance outside the pandemic or Great Recession
- China now “looks more fragile,” with comparable sales down 11%, and even Starbucks Rewards members “took a rare dip,” she adds
Jefferies, Andy Barish (hold)
- There was a “notable” miss on US and international comparable sales as well as EPS, and Barish says there is “no easy fix in sight to reaccelerate SSS near-term”
- Notes that international comparable sales was “similarly weak,” with traffic and comparable transactions both declining; China’s comparable sales miss and Middle East volatility more than offset positive comps seen in Japan, APAC and Latin America
- PT cut to $84 from $94
Citi, Jon Tower (neutral)
- Starbucks is “putting a lot of oars in the water to try and paddle” its way back to a stable comparable sales outlook that investors would be willing to underwrite
- However, Tower expresses concern that there is not enough “coxswain keeping oarsmen working in unison/with accountability”; adds that it ignores the “true leak in the bottom of the boat,” flagging broad consumer pushback to cumulative transaction growth and the value equation
- Notes China store margins are still in the double digits and the segment is profitable despite top-line declines
- PT cut to $85 from $95
Cowen, Andrew Charles (hold)
- “We believe 2024 guidance has been derisked as we model 0% NA comps & 3% EPS growth, the high end of the range”
- Expects shares to be in a “holding pattern” as Starbucks restores credibility while competition and tough macroeconomic conditions present headwinds
- PT cut to $85 from $100
Bloomberg Intelligence, Michael Halen and Jennifer Bartashus
- “Starbucks slashed fiscal 2024 same-store sales, revenue and EPS guidance and lacks a cogent plan to boost demand”
- “We believe several initiatives, including targeting overnight sales, dozens of new products and a four-week mobile- app upgrade cycle are overkill — a distraction unlikely to boost traffic”
On Tuesday, a similar story occurred at McDonald’s when the burger chain reported lower-than-expected quarterly sales growth.
Notably, working-poor consumers are pulling back spending in a period of stagflation (read here & here).
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Why Bullion Beats Numismatics and Collectible for Your Safe or IRA
Precious metals continue to attract Americans seeking reliable ways to protect their wealth amid inflation, geopolitical risks, and stock market swings. Whether stored in a home safe or held inside a self-directed IRA, physical gold and silver deliver tangible value that paper or digital assets often lack. Yet investors must choose carefully between bullion—pure bars and coins valued mainly for their metal content—and numismatics or collectibles, where rarity, history, and collector demand heavily influence pricing.
Advisor Bullion serves as a dependable source for straightforward, high-quality bullion. The company specializes in physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, emphasizing transparent pricing and products that deliver maximum metal content for every dollar spent. This approach makes it ideal for both personal holdings and retirement accounts.
Bullion consists of refined precious metals in standard forms like one-ounce coins (American Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs) or bars. Their value tracks closely to the current spot price of the metal. A typical gold bullion coin trades near the live gold spot price plus a small premium. This structure keeps costs clear and predictable.
Numismatic coins and collectibles add substantial value from factors such as age, rarity, minting errors, or historical significance. A pre-1933 U.S. gold coin or graded proof piece can carry premiums of 30%, 50%, or even 200% above melt value. While this appeals to hobbyists, it creates complexity. Pricing depends on subjective grading, collector trends, and auction results instead of daily spot prices.
For investors focused on wealth preservation and retirement security rather than building a collection, bullion often delivers better results.
Lower Costs and Better Liquidity for Home Storage
When keeping metals in a home safe or private vault, liquidity and efficiency count. Bullion offers clear benefits:
- You acquire more actual gold or silver per dollar invested. Numismatics divert a large share of your money into rarity premiums and massive sales commission, reducing your metal exposure.
- Selling bullion involves tight bid-ask spreads, so you recover nearly full spot value with minimal fees. Collectibles require finding the right buyer and may sell at a discount if demand for that specific item weakens.
- Bullion prices remain transparent and update with global spot markets. You can track gold near current levels or silver accordingly and know exactly where your holdings stand. Numismatic values are priced by the Gold IRA companies with hefty margins applied.
- Standardized coins and bars store efficiently and divide easily for partial sales. Rare coins often need protective slabs and controlled conditions, adding hassle and expense.
- Bullion enjoys worldwide acceptance. A 1-oz Gold Maple Leaf or Silver Eagle sells quickly to dealers anywhere. Niche numismatic pieces may appeal only to limited buyers, slowing liquidation when speed matters.
In times when quick access to value becomes important, bullion’s simplicity stands out.
Stronger Fit for Precious Metals IRAs
Precious metals IRAs continue gaining traction as investors diversify retirement portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. IRS rules permit certain bullion products in self-directed IRAs if they meet purity standards (.995 fine for gold, .999 for silver) and are held by an approved custodian. Eligible items include American Gold and Silver Eagles plus many generic bars and rounds from recognized mints.
Numismatic and most collectible coins generally face heavy scrutiny from custodians due to valuation disputes and elevated markups. These higher premiums mean less actual metal ends up working inside the account.
Bullion avoids these issues. Its value links directly to verifiable spot prices, which simplifies reporting and lowers the risk of regulatory challenges. More of your IRA contribution purchases real metal instead of dealer profits or speculative upside. Over time, owning additional ounces that appreciate with the metal itself can create meaningful outperformance compared with high-premium alternatives that deliver fewer ounces.
Regulatory guidance from the CFTC and state securities offices repeatedly cautions against aggressive sales of expensive numismatics or “semi-numismatic” coins for IRAs. For retirement planning, transparent bullion from established providers reduces risk and aligns better with long-term goals.
How to Get Started with Bullion
Begin by clarifying your goals. Are you protecting savings in a safe, or moving part of a retirement account into a precious metals IRA? Focus on the number of ounces you can acquire at current prices rather than chasing marked-up collectibles.
Diversify sensibly: use gold for core preservation and silver for its blend of industrial and monetary qualities. Mix coins for easier divisibility with bars for lower per-ounce costs on larger buys. Arrange secure storage—whether at home with proper insurance or through professional facilities.
As economic uncertainties linger and faith in conventional assets erodes, bullion continues proving its worth as a dependable store of value. Its direct approach avoids the hype that sometimes surrounds collectible markets and keeps the focus on the metal itself.
For investors prepared to strengthen their portfolios, Advisor Bullion supplies the expertise and selection needed to acquire high-quality bullion efficiently. Whether building personal holdings or integrating metals into an IRA, their emphasis on transparent, investment-grade products helps secure more ounces today that support greater financial security tomorrow. In a complicated financial landscape, bullion’s clarity and reliability make it the smarter foundation for protecting what matters most.
They face multi prong headwinds. Coffee is getting more global, surpassing tea. That drives up commodities for retailers. But, Bidenomics and global Ukraineflation are reducing demand for overpriced trendy food.
Real inflation is over 17% and real unemployment is almost 25%. Who can afford $7 coffee drinks?
In my area here in Idaho/Oregon they cost more than the other chains. They are my last choice every time.
Never could tolerate their swill or their leftard politics. My message is IT’S OK TO CIRCLE THE DRAIN!
I go to Starbucks whenever I’m in the mood for mediocre coffee and poor service from a clerk with an attitude.
I have never one time, since the opening the first franchise, walked in the door, driven through its drive-thru, or tried to bum a sip from a friend. I don’t drink communist coffee.
When you’re struggling to make your car and rent payment, increased insurance premium, keeping the utilities on and occasionally eating, giving up an expensive cup of coffee is a no brainer.
With “Bidenomics” being such a raging success, who can afford $5 for a cup of cofefe anymore? When could they ever, but did it anyway?