(Daily Signal)—I’d like to talk today about the status of Mexican-American, not as a Mexican-American citizen, but Mexico’s relationship with the United States. What is the Mexican-American status quo now? It’s very disturbing.
I’ll just give you an example of what I mean: We sent deported criminals back to Mexico and they forbid—we were going to, and they would not allow them to land in Mexico. We had people of the cartel shoot an American citizen on U.S. land and shoot at our Border Patrol. So, what is Mexico? Is it neutral? Is it an ally? Is it an enemy? Is it a frenemy?
Here’s some data. Right now, we have a trade deficit with Mexico of $150 billion. Remember Ross Perot? I was about in my 40s, early 40s, in 1992-96, third-party candidate. He said, “You’re going to hear a big sucking sound.” What he meant was your jobs are going to go to Mexico. They’re going to run up surpluses.
We’re going to get hurt. I thought that was, kind of, a little bit dramatic. That’s exactly what happened. When he warned that, as soon as NAFTA went in, they had a $2 [billion] to $3 billion and then $10 [billion] and then $40 [billion] and then $60 [billion]. The deficit with Mexico will be about $168 billion per year now. It was in 2024, it’ll be bigger. $167 billion. They—that does not include, that does not include the $63 billion that Mexican expatriates—the vast majority here illegally—send back to Mexico.
And it’s worse than that. How does somebody who’s impoverished, from some of the poorest areas of Mexico, free up $400 or $500, $600 of their income to send back to the Mexican government—I don’t say Mexican government directly, but relieving the Mexican government or their responsibilities to have a social network for their own family, for people’s family. And the answer is they’re on subsidies, local, state, federal, housing, education, food, health care, provided by the American taxpayer.
And, a third thing that’s very worrisome—we should all be worrisome—on average, 75,000 Americans die of fentanyl overdoses per year. And it’s been going on for several years, at least a decade. But here’s the problem, it’s not as [former president of Mexico] Mr. [Andres] Obrador says, “Our fault”; partly an addict, he has to take responsibility.
But the cartels take raw products to make fentanyl, shipped in deliberately by China who wants us to suffer, and then repackages it in special cartel industries and then disguises it for export into the United States. Sometimes by lacing it into fake pharmaceuticals that are prescription drugs and sometimes putting it into opiates, so that the user may get a high but won’t be killed, but may be killed because they’re inexact or they’re deliberate, who knows?
And if you total that up over a decade, that’s 750,000 deaths. That’s more than all of the wars of the 20th century and the 21st century—World War I, World War II, Korea, Vietnam, First Gulf War, Iraq, Afghanistan—all the people who died by our enemies. The Mexican government or the cartels—and I say Mexican government by enabling the cartels—have killed Americans.
It’s worse than that. In addition to that, the Mexican government votes against the United States on almost every major referendum at the United Nations, especially anything to deal with the Middle East. So, this is my point. They are deliberately exporting their poor, and now we had 12 million people come in. And their way of thinking, this is wonderful.
We have a safety valve. So, if we have internal dissension because we’ve exploited indigenous people, we send them to the United States. No. 2, they send back $63 billion. It’s our second-largest source of foreign exchange—more than tourism and oil—right next to the trade surplus we get with the United States.
And then the cartels, we don’t know how much they make, but that money is fungible. So, between this trade surplus of $167 billion, plus the $63 billion and remittances, plus whatever the cartels make—$20 [billion] to $30 billion from their opiate sales in the United States—we’re getting over $200 billion off of this asymmetrical relationship. And we pay the United States back by saying, “If you dare deport people who have committed a felony or a crime, we’re going to block your arrival.”
So, I don’t know what Mexico is, but I know what we can do about it. Twenty percent tax on anybody who sends, anywhere in the United States, money back to Mexico. That would raise about $12 billion. That would send a message. And then we have a tariff. Donald Trump says he’s going to do it very quickly and that would tell Mexico, you’re not going to run up a $167 billion under the guise of the North American Free Trade [Agreement]. Not going to happen. And then we’re going to tell them, if you don’t deal with the cartels we will. And I think Mexico will come to attention.
And we will not have Ms. [Claudia] Sheinbaum, the president of Mexico, saying what Mr. Obrador did, during the Biden administration. It’s a beautiful thing that 40 million people have come to the United States illegally. Oh, by the way, I suggest all you people who can vote in the United States, vote against Republican. And he did that again, and again, and again.
It’s time for us to be very sober, careful, judicious and say to Mexico, “You have to decide whether you’re a friend, an ally, or an enemy. Because right now, you are an enemy of the United States. And we will take the necessary adjustments—make the necessary adjustments for that unfortunate fact.”
Editor’s note: This is a lightly edited transcript of today’s video from Daily Signal Senior Contributor Victor Davis Hanson. Subscribe to our YouTube channel to see more of his videos.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
In light of this, do we really want them sending 10K troops to our border? I don’t trust them.
Mexico has been our enemy at least since Santana. The scrubs even initially sided with the Axis in WWII
Sir, you make absolute sense. I do not see Mexico as a friendly nation towards United States. Trumps border wall needs directed as soon as possible. Every illegal alien in the United States needs rounded up and removed. There should be no more personal money transferred from the United States to Mexico. And they’re 10,000 troops they put on the border, that’s laughable. These truths are not trust worthy.
This is so good coming from VDH – it validates what I have said for many years. If you go down to Mexico (which I never will again) and you get away from the tourist towns, Mexicans HATE America. Actually the Mexican media in the big towns also HATE America. Maybe Mexicans are like so many Americans who fall for media propaganda.
Mexico is at war with the US. They are dumping their garbage on us. Forget what the Demo-commie-crats tell us about “hard working Mexicans”. They are so screwed up they dump their own kids on the border.
The US should tell Mexico that for every illegal alien invader, we will send B-52s over Mexico City and drop a 2,000 lb bomb on your god damned city. Maybe they will cut the crap.
I live on the border-Texas-and Mexico is not and has never been our friends. They support the invasion because those who cross the border send a never-ending stream of cash back to Mexico, goosing their economy. They are leftists. Love to mess with the US. Are in bed with our enemies. Kill our citizens.
Time to cut all ties to Mexico. No goods need to cross the border. Shoot to kill on all border crossers. When the border is sealed, they will consume themselves.