(Just The News)—A large majority of the 75 largest cities in the U.S. are in financial trouble, according to a new report.
Truth in Accounting released the report, which evaluated the 75 largest cities in the country, arguing that the majority of cities have financial problems and owe thousands of dollars in debt per taxpayer.
“This means that to claim their budgets were balanced – as is required by law in the 75 cities – elected officials have not included the full cost of the government in their budget calculations and have pushed costs onto future taxpayers,” the report said.
The group came to these numbers by taking into account financial obligations cities do not always consider in their budgeting.
Truth In Accounting has called on Congress to adopt full accrual accounting, which “provides a far more complete and transparent picture of financial performance. It accounts for all financial obligations – both current and future – by recognizing expenses when they are incurred rather than when cash changes hands.”
The group argues that the published debt figures for local, state and federal governments are misleading and actually much higher when you consider other factors like future unfunded liabilities.
For example, the federal government reports its national debt at around $36 trillion; Truth in Accounting says it is actually about 4.5 five times larger.
According to the report, retiree health benefits and pensions are a major weight around the necks of many city budgets, dragging them into debt.
“The 75 cities had $321 billion worth of assets available to pay bills; their debt, including unfunded retirement benefit promises, amounted to $621.7 billion,” the report added. “Pension debt totaled $192.1 billion, and other postemployment benefits (OPEB), mainly retiree health care, totaled $136.4 billion.
The report evaluated the cities as of fiscal year 2023. It found New York City as the worst city fiscally, followed by Chicago, Portland, New Orleans and Honolulu. The best city came in as Washington, D.C., followed by Lincoln, Irvine, Tampa and Cleveland.
“This year’s research indicates that as the U.S. economy continues to recover, cities have reported revenues surpassing their expenses,” the report said. “However, the growing burden of unfunded pension and retiree healthcare liabilities has overshadowed these financial gains. These liabilities now account for more than half of the cities’ non-capital debt and are laden with risks and uncertainties that often lie beyond the control of legislators, taxpayers, and even those managing the plans.”
From the report:
The uncertainty surrounding estimated future benefit payments is significant, as it depends on unpredictable factors such as life expectancy, inflation rates, healthcare costs, and investment performance. Even small changes in these assumptions can drastically alter the total future liabilities. For example, in more than 20 cities, a reduction in the discount rate – the interest rate used to determine the amount of money needed today to cover future benefits – resulted in a notable decrease in the dollar amount of unfunded retiree healthcare benefits.
Cities without funds set aside for these benefits are assumed to need to borrow money to cover the costs, meaning the discount rate must reflect the borrowing rate the government would face. This reduction in the discount rate was driven by the Federal Reserve’s decision to lower interest rates, which in turn led to a notable decrease in the rate at which governments could borrow money. The variability in these assumptions makes it challenging for cities to plan accurately for future obligations, further complicating efforts to ensure sufficient funding.
The report found that most cities have debt and therefore a taxpayer burden on its residents, while some have a taxpayer surplus, a number many local officials would likely dispute given the different accounting standards.
Here are all of the cities with Truth in Accounting’s reported surplus or burden (note, the dollars listed below are per each taxpayer in the cities):
- Albuquerque, N.M. Taxpayer Burden: $4,000
- Anaheim, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $5,100
- Anchorage, Alaska Taxpayer Burden: $1,000
- Arlington, Texas Taxpayer Surplus: $1,500
- Atlanta, Ga. Taxpayer Burden: $3,100
- Aurora, Colo. Taxpayer Surplus: $2,800
- Austin, Texas Taxpayer Burden: $11,700
- Bakersfield, Calif. Taxpayer Surplus: $800
- Baltimore, Md. Taxpayer Burden: $14,400
- Boston, Mass. Taxpayer Burden: $10,600
- Charlotte, N.C. Taxpayer Surplus: $1,000
- Chicago, Ill. Taxpayer Burden: $40,600
- Chula Vista, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $600
- Cincinnati, Ohio Taxpayer Burden: $13,400
- Cleveland, Ohio Taxpayer Surplus: $2,900
- Colorado Springs, Colo. Taxpayer Surplus: $800
- Columbus, Ohio Taxpayer Burden: $2,000
- Corpus Christi, Texas Taxpayer Surplus: $400
- Dallas, Texas Taxpayer Burden: $13,300
- Denver, Colo. Taxpayer Burden: $15
- Detroit, Mich. Taxpayer Burden: $1,600
- El Paso, Texas Taxpayer Burden: $2,300
- Fort Wayne, Ind. Taxpayer Surplus: $200
- Fort Worth, Texas Taxpayer Burden: $4,100
- Fresno, Calif. Taxpayer Surplus: $2,700
- Greensboro, N.C. Taxpayer Burden: $1,100
- Henderson, Nev. Taxpayer Burden: $1,200
- Honolulu, Hawaii Taxpayer Burden: $17,400
- Houston, Texas Taxpayer Burden: $5,700
- Indianapolis, Ind. Taxpayer Burden: $3,600
- Irvine, Calif. Taxpayer Surplus: $4,200
- Jacksonville, Fla. Taxpayer Burden: $9,800
- Kansas City, Mo. Taxpayer Burden: $8,800
- Las Vegas, Nev. Taxpayer Burden: $500
- Lexington, Ky. Taxpayer Burden: $5,500
- Lincoln, Neb. Taxpayer Surplus: $4,300
- Long Beach, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $1,800
- Los Angeles, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $1,000
- Louisville, Ky. Taxpayer Surplus: $2,600
- Memphis, Tenn. Taxpayer Burden: $9,100
- Mesa, Ariz. Taxpayer Burden: $4,000
- Miami, Fla. Taxpayer Burden: $13,400
- Milwaukee, Wis. Taxpayer Burden: $15,100
- Minneapolis, Minn. Taxpayer Burden: $600
- Nashville, Tenn. Taxpayer Burden: $1,600
- New Orleans, La. Taxpayer Burden: $18,300
- New York City, N.Y. Taxpayer Burden: $56,800
- Oakland, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $7,800
- Oklahoma City, Okla. Taxpayer Surplus: $2,900
- Omaha, Neb. Taxpayer Burden: $6,400
- Orlando, Fla. Taxpayer Surplus: $300
- Philadelphia, Penn. Taxpayer Burden: $17,300
- Phoenix, Ariz. Taxpayer Burden: $3,200
- Pittsburgh, Penn. Taxpayer Burden: $10,500
- Plano, Texas Taxpayer Surplus: $2,300
- Portland, Ore. Taxpayer Burden: $18,600
- Raleigh, N.C. Taxpayer Surplus: $2,700
- Riverside, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $1,700
- Sacramento, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $2,500
- Saint Paul, Minn. Taxpayer Burden: $4,200
- San Antonio, Texas Taxpayer Burden: $1,400
- San Diego, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $3,900
- San Francisco, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $12,800
- San Jose, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $6,700
- Santa Ana, Calif. Taxpayer Burden: $5,400
- Seattle, Wash. Taxpayer Burden: $1,700
- St. Louis, Mo. Taxpayer Burden: $9,800
- Stockton, Cailf. Taxpayer Burden: $1,000
- Tampa, Fla. Taxpayer Surplus: $3,400
- Toledo, Ohio Taxpayer Burden: $2,200
- Tucson, Ariz. Taxpayer Burden: $6,900
- Tulsa, Okla. Taxpayer Surplus: $200
- Virginia Beach, Va. Taxpayer Surplus: $25
- Washington, D.C. Taxpayer Surplus: $9,000
- Wichita, Kan. Taxpayer Surplus: $700
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.