(Just The News)—California has lost 173,000 fully private sector jobs since January 2023, offset by a gain of 181,100 largely part-time government and government-supported jobs.
Thirty-eight percent of these new government and government-supported jobs are from elderly or disabled individuals using state funds to pay household members and others minimum wage for part-time care and assistance.
The report also found that while hourly wages are up, average hours worked are down, suggesting employers are cutting hours to reduce labor costs, such as those imposed by the state’s sector-based minimum wages.
According to the new report from the California Center for Jobs and the Economy, a project of the California Business Roundtable pro-business association, “California’s job growth has been dominated by government and government dependent jobs in Healthcare & Social Assistance.”
CCJE says of the 181,100 new taxpayer-funded jobs, 124,800 were in health care and social assistance, and that 55% of those were from the government’s household care program.
“Using the unadjusted series, Social Assistance — composed primarily of minimum wage, part-time, government paid jobs in In-Home & Supportive Services (IHSS) — was responsible for 55% of the Healthcare & Social Assistance jobs growth in California — and 2/3 of total net jobs growth. This source comprised only 4% to 16% in the other states.”
The report said in the private sector, essentially only “green” energy and transportation jobs experienced any growth.
“Trade related jobs in Transportation, Trade & Utilities have been the one bright spot in the state’s recovery progress, but as indicated in the Texas numbers, California’s lead in this area has been under increasing competition from other regions,” continued the report. “To put it more directly, other than in Trade, California has not grown jobs during the past 4 years of recovery; it has bought them with public funds.”
Without state and federal funding and regulations mandating labor and capital-intensive replacement of energy and transportation infrastructure, it’s thus likely every single sector in the private industry in California would have shrunk over the past two years.
The report also said the low quality of the new “jobs” could create issues for the state over time.
“California has not expanded its tax base; it has used that tax base to cover its competitive weakness for private sector jobs,” wrote the CCJE. “And the jobs California has bought are not the ‘good-paying’ jobs promised in the state’s economic development goals, but are predominantly minimum wage, part-time and limited term.”
Last year, the state-funded Legislative Analyst’s Office reported the state’s fully private sector employment started contracting in 2022 and that all job growth had been through government.
Now, the LAO has a new report on just how much IHSS — which largely facilitates elderly and disabled individuals paying household members $21.65 per hour for the time they spend together — will cost the state in the coming 2025-2026 fiscal year.
California Gov. Gavin Newsom has proposed a $28.5 billion budget for IHSS this coming year, due to an estimated 7% increase in caseload and 2.9% increase in labor costs.
The LAO explained IHSS recipients generally can receive up to 283 hours of paid assistance per month “with tasks such as bathing, dressing, housework and meal preparation,” and that county workers conduct assessments to approve service hours.
“In most cases, the recipient is responsible for hiring and supervising a paid IHSS provider — oftentimes a family member or relative,” wrote the LAO. “The average number of service hours that will be provided to an estimated 771,650 IHSS recipients is projected to be 123.7 hours per month in 2025-26.”
The LAO noted most costs for the program are shared with the federal government, and as a Medicaid program, receives 50% reimbursement from federal taxpayers, leaving the state and county governments with the rest of the tab, except in the case of certain individuals with federal reimbursement rates of up to 90%.
The LAO warned “caseloads are growing at an increasing rate.”
The office noted program growth has risen since all illegal immigrants were made eligible for Medi-Cal and the state ended asset means-testing for the program, allowing technically low-income but asset-rich individuals to qualify for taxpayer-funded healthcare, nursing and other benefits.
The LAO also said demographic changes are further increasing IHSS spending.
The state expects a quarter of Californians to be 60 or older by 2030, which, combined with the out-migration of net taxpayers and in-migration of net beneficiaries, could further complicate the state’s deteriorating budget.
Even with current spending levels, the LAO says the state will face a $20 billion deficit for 2026 and that will continue to rise to $30 billion by the end of the decade.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.