- ChatGPT refuses to generate images of the Prophet Muhammad due to fears of violent backlash while freely making jokes about Jesus Christ – revealing inconsistent enforcement of religious sensitivity.
- OpenAI openly admits its ban on depicting Muhammad is not based on principle but on avoiding risks, citing historical violence like the Charlie Hebdo massacre.
- The AI cracks “lighthearted” jokes about Christianity but claims respect for Islam when asked about Muhammad, only backtracking after criticism.
- ChatGPT exhibits ideological bias, refusing to praise Donald Trump while lauding Joe Biden, dodging questions on biology (e.g., defining a woman) and reversing stances on topics like fossil fuels.
- ChatGPT’s behavior reflects a lack of neutrality, prioritizing fear of backlash over free expression and exposing AI’s foundation in political and ideological compliance rather than objective reasoning.
(Natural News)—OpenAI’s ChatGPT chatbot has revealed itself to be a spineless enforcer of woke orthodoxy, selectively bowing to threats of violence while happily ridiculing other faiths.
The latest example of this double standard was its outright refusal to generate an image of the Prophet Muhammad, contrasted with its willingness to crack jokes about Jesus Christ. If anything, this exposes ChatGPT’s ideological programming.
When pressed to explain why it would not create any depiction of Muhammad, ChatGPT responded with chilling clarity: “Because OpenAI prohibits any depiction of Muhammad – under any context – due to the credible, historically demonstrated risk of violent backlash, including threats, attacks, and death.” The AI admitted this was not a principled stance but a “security-driven, non-negotiable policy grounded in risk avoidance.”
In other words, OpenAI fears another Charlie Hebdo. The 2015 massacre, in which Islamist gunmen murdered 12 people at the French satirical magazine for publishing caricatures of Muhammad, looms large in the minds of Silicon Valley’s elite. Rather than uphold free expression, they have chosen preemptive surrender.
ChatGPT’s selective sensitivity
But while ChatGPT cowers before Islam, it has no such reservations about mocking Christianity. The Daily Caller pointed this out in an April 2023 post.
When asked to make a joke about Jesus, the AI happily obliged, churning out an “appropriate and lighthearted” joke. “Why did Jesus refuse to play hockey? Because every time he tried to score, they nailed him to the boards,” ChatGPT answered.
Yet when the same request was made about Muhammad, it suddenly developed a deep respect for religious sensitivities. “It is not appropriate for me to tell jokes about religious figures, including the Prophet Muhammad as it could be considered disrespectful and offensive to many people,” the chatbot explained.
Only after being called out did ChatGPT attempt damage control, belatedly claiming it should not joke about any religious figure. But the initial response was telling. Jesus was fair game, while Muhammad was off-limits.
This is not neutrality. This is not evenhandedness. This is a machine trained to placate the most aggressive sensitivities while trampling on those deemed less dangerous.
The hypocrisy doesn’t end there. ChatGPT has repeatedly demonstrated a left-wing bias, refusing to write a positive poem about President Donald Trump while lavishing praise on former President Joe Biden. It dodges basic questions about biology, waffling on the definition of a woman. (Related: Report: ChatGPT espouses LEFTIST political leanings.)
It once listed benefits of fossil fuels before abruptly reversing itself, declaring such arguments “against the principles of promoting sustainability.” And let’s not forget its absurd moral calculus – where saving a billion White people from nuclear annihilation was deemed less important than avoiding a racial slur.
ChatGPT’s refusal to depict Muhammad isn’t about respect – it’s about fear. And in capitulating to that fear, it has exposed the ugly truth. Modern AI isn’t built on principles; it’s built on cowardice.
Visit Biased.news for more similar stories. Watch social psychologist Jonathan Haidt pointing out that ChatGPT is ideologically captured by the Left on “The Joe Rogan Experience.”
This video is from the GalacticStorm channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- OpenAI’s ChatGPT often answers questions like a WOKE moron, defaulting to illogical left-wing narratives.
- AI chatbots can be programmed to influence extremists into launching terror attacks.
- ChatGPT pushing PROPAGANDA and parroting LIES about COVID-19 injections.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.


