(Substack)—On Wednesday afternoon, over 100 masked anti-Israel protesters stormed Columbia University’s Butler Library in New York City, bypassing security as students studied for finals, prompting university officials to call in the New York Police Department (NYPD) to manage the disruptive crowd.
The NYPD arrested more than 80 individuals, all Columbia students, according to Fox News sources. U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) monitored the situation, with plans to fingerprint arrestees to identify any non-citizens.
“Time to make a point,” an ICE source told Fox News.
Non-protesting students were forced to abandon their studies and evacuate the library, they told Fox News. The State Department issued a warning to foreign students about legal consequences, stating, “Foreign university students in America have been put on notice: if you break the law or support terrorism in our country, we will revoke your visa. This administration will not tolerate noncitizens causing mayhem on our college campuses.”
Secretary of State Marco Rubio added, “We are reviewing the visa status of the trespassers and vandals who took over Columbia University’s library. Pro-Hamas thugs are no longer welcome in our great nation.”
The protesters were reportedly supporting Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate and alleged leader of pro-Palestinian protests at the Ivy League school, along with other students. Khalil was arrested last month at his university-owned apartment in NYC, with Homeland Security Investigations (HSI), part of ICE, informing him that his green card and student visa were being revoked, per his attorney, Amy Greer. He was then detained in Louisiana.
Protesters renamed Butler Library the “Basel Al-Araj Popular University” and established a liberation zone, according to posted flyers. Students reported that the group climbed on desks, chanted “Free Palestine,” and demanded Columbia divest from Israel, raising concerns about a potential encampment.
Public safety officials told masked protesters they couldn’t leave the library without showing ID cards. “Nobody comes in, nobody comes out,” a Columbia security officer at a campus gate entry stated.
Columbia’s acting president, Claire Shipman, said the university requested NYPD assistance to secure the building after two public safety officers were injured. “Sadly, during the course of this disruption, two of our Columbia Public Safety Officers sustained injuries during a crowd surge when individuals attempted to force their way into the building and into Room 301,” Shipman said. “These actions are outrageous.”
She added, “Individuals participating in the Reading Room 301 disruption were repeatedly asked for identification and to leave, and were repeatedly told that failure to comply would result in violations of our rules and policies and possible arrest for trespassing. We have been clear from the outset about applying our protocols and advising participants of the potential consequences of not complying. Requesting the presence of the NYPD is not the outcome we wanted, but it was absolutely necessary to secure the safety of our community.”
An NYPD source told Fox News that arrests were necessary to identify the suspects. New York Mayor Eric Adams expressed support for Jewish New Yorkers, particularly Columbia students, and urged protesters’ parents to intervene, saying, “Make clear that breaking the law is wrong and they should exit the building immediately.” He also warned non-Columbia protesters, “Exit the campus immediately or you will be arrested. We will not tolerate hate or violence in any form in our city.”
A university spokesperson previously stated, “These disruptions of our campus and academic activities will not be tolerated. Individuals found to be in violation of University Rules and policies will face disciplinary consequences. We ask our community members to please avoid the immediate area near Butler Library in the near term.”
Last month, Columbia warned it would dismantle any encampments and potentially arrest agitators if they attempted to establish them again this year, following last year’s protests where students occupied Hamilton Hall and clashed with police in riot gear. Those protests, sparked by Israel’s war in Gaza after Hamas’ October 7, 2023, attacks that killed over 1,200 people, led to over 200 arrests.
The university emphasized that while it values free expression and protest rights, these must comply with rules to ensure safety and uninterrupted academic activities, with authorities prepared to remove tents and disperse demonstrators immediately.
Columbia President Minouche Shafik resigned after criticism over her handling of the protests, which often escalated into clashes between anti-Israel demonstrators and police, amid rising antisemitism on campus. The university faced scrutiny, with the Trump administration canceling $400 million in federal grants in March due to Columbia’s “failure to protect Jewish students from antisemitic harassment,” leading to layoffs of 180 staff members.
“Across the research portfolio we have had to make difficult choices and unfortunately, today, nearly 180 of our colleagues who have been working, in whole or in part, on impacted federal grants, will receive notices of non-renewal or termination,” Shipman said. “This represents about 20% of the individuals who are funded in some manner by the terminated grant.”
U.S. Rep. Lisa McClain, R-Mich., chair of the House GOP, criticized Democrats pushing for university investigations, saying, “We don’t need to do an investigation. We know what the problem is. They have laws and they don’t follow them. Columbia is a prime example of what happens when there are no consequences to one’s actions.”
Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y., supported Trump’s decision to withhold funds, writing on X:
While Columbia students try to study for finals, they’re being bombarded with chants for a “global intifada.”
President @realDonaldTrump is right: not a single taxpayer dollar should go to a university that allows chaos, antisemitism, and civil rights violations on its campus.… pic.twitter.com/OiXgdYZXZp
— Rep. Elise Stefanik (@RepStefanik) May 7, 2025
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.