(The Epoch Times)—Existing single-family home prices continued to rise in 189 out of 228 U.S. metro areas in the first quarter, with some areas reporting double-digit gains, according to the latest report from the National Association of Realtors (NAR).
The May 8 report shows home price gains in 83 percent of metro areas, a slight decline from 89 percent in the fourth quarter of 2024.
Home prices saw double-digit increases in 11 percent of metro areas, down from 14 percent in the previous quarter. The national median sales price of existing homes rose 3.4 percent from this time last year, to $402,300.
“Most metro markets continue to set new record highs for home prices,” said NAR chief economist Lawrence Yun in the report. “In the first quarter, the Northeast performed best in both sales and price gains by percentage.”
Home prices in the region rose 10.3 percent.
The South registered the largest share of existing home sales at 44.9 percent in the first quarter, with a year-over-year price appreciation of 1.3 percent. Prices increased by 5.2 percent in the Midwest and 4.1 percent in the West.
Syracuse, New York, placed first in price upticks among the top 10 markets, soaring by 17.9 percent. It is the fifth most populous city in the state, and the Syracuse metro area—home to over 650,000 people—is the major urban center of central New York state.
David Manzano, Sr., president of the Greater Syracuse Association of Realtors, told The Epoch Times he was not surprised by NAR’s findings.
“Before COVID, Syracuse was extremely affordable and I think, undervalued,” he said. “You could buy a decent single-family home for under $100,000.”
Like much of the nation during the COVID-19 pandemic, Syracuse experienced a significant drop in inventory as people from downstate New York and other areas moved into the metro area, taking advantage of record-low mortgage interest rates.
“We ended up with an influx of buyers, and while over the years inventory started to increase, we’re still well below the average at just 1.6 months of supply,” Manzano said.
The area has been popular with inventors purchasing homes for rentals, in addition to a large number of former residents moving back from Florida, due to concerns about the weather.
An influx of new job seekers is also expected this year as Micron Technology plans to begin construction of a massive chipmaking complex in the town of Clay in November. Located just north of Syracuse, the complex will consist of two fabrication plants to start, and possibly two additional plants over the next 20 years.
The complex would also require thousands of construction workers to build the plants, and possibly thousands of tech-savvy employees once the plants are completed. “This project will be one of the largest microchip manufacturing facilities in the state,” Manzano said.
NAR listed the Syracuse metro area’s median single-family home price at $234,300 at the end of the first quarter. Manzano indicated that as of the end of April, the median has risen to $240,000—still considered a “bargain” for someone relocating from the New York City metro area.
Following Syracuse was Montgomery, with a 16.1 percent increase, and the greater Youngstown, Ohio, metro area experienced a sales growth of 13.6 percent.
Median home prices at the end of the first quarter were listed at $230,000 in Montgomery and $161,900 in Youngstown. Long Island, New York, held fourth place with a 12 percent home price hike and median price of $779,300. Toledo, Ohio, was fifth with prices rising by 11.1 percent and a median price of $183,900.
Completing the top 10 locations with home price increases were Cleveland-Elyria, Ohio, and Rochester, New York, both with 11.1 percent price increases; Gulfport-Biloxi-Pascagoula, Mississippi, at 10.5 percent; Trenton, New Jersey, at 10.4 percent; and the Allentown-Bethlehem-Easton, Pennsylvania, region at 10.2 percent.
Not surprisingly, eight of the top 10 most expensive U.S. markets were in California, with the San Jose-Sunnyvale-Santa Clara metro region seeing home prices escalate by 9.8 percent to a new median of $2.02 million. Anaheim-Santa Ana-Irvine region’s median price grew by 6.2 percent to $1.45 million, while the San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward region experienced price gains of 1.5 percent, to a median of $1.32 million.
Other California locations with home price gains included San Diego-Carlsbad, Salinas, San Luis Obispo-Paso Robles, Oxnard-Thousand Oaks-Ventura, and Los Angeles-Long Beach-Glendale.
Honolulu, Hawaii, and Naples-Immokalee-Marco Island, Florida, rounded out the 10 most expensive U.S. metro markets.
“Very expensive home prices partly reflect multiple years of home underproduction in those metro markets,” Yun said. “Another factor is the low homeownership rates in these areas, implying more unequal wealth distribution. Affordable markets tend to have more adequate supply and higher homeownership rates.”
On the flip side, 38 of the 228 metro areas, or 17 percent, showed home price declines in the first quarter. These areas included Austin and San Antonio, Texas; Huntsville, Alabama; Myrtle Beach, South Carolina; Raleigh, North Carolina; and several markets in Florida.
The NAR report also stated that housing affordability improved slightly during the first quarter. The national average monthly payment on an existing single-family home with a 20 percent down payment was $2,120. Families typically spend about 24.4 percent of their income on mortgage payments, which is down from 24.8 percent in the prior quarter.
A family income of at least $100,000 is needed to afford a 10 percent down payment mortgage in 45.1 percent of markets.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.