(The Epoch Times)—U.S. ports are strategic infrastructure upon which the nation’s economic stability and military readiness depend, yet remain highly exposed to an attack that could ground billions in trade activity or defense operations to a halt. In fact, adversaries have already infiltrated U.S. port infrastructure, and the path forward must be one that adopts “zero trust” principles, experts say.
“Zero trust is a fundamental shift in the way that we view and defend our enterprise and [operational technology] environments,” David Forbes, director of cyber physical defense at management consulting company Booz Allen Hamilton, said at an event on July 31 discussing a report released July 29 by Booz Allen and the McCrary Institute for Cyber and Critical Infrastructure Security.
“It changes the way we think about cyber defense, so we are here assuming breach.”
The report, titled “Anchored in Zero Trust: Taking Action to Create Resilient U.S. Port Infrastructure,” outlines the current exposure to risk and offers policy recommendations and operator best practices to secure the ports.
“We know that adversaries are on our networks. They’re in our infrastructure. Volt Typhoon has proven this in a broad range of critical infrastructure sectors, and maritime ports can be and should be at the center of that,” Forbes said.
Ports Exposed
The roughly 360 ports in the United States handle more than 40 percent of goods entering or leaving the country, valued at about $2.1 trillion.
The zero trust approach assumes systems are already breached, building in continuous verification rather than defending systems at the perimeter.
The McCrary Institute–Booz Allen report notes cases in which U.S. ports have already been subject to disruptive cyber activity, including a Volt Typhoon hack on the Port of Houston in 2021.
Just last year, the Port of Seattle was hit by a ransomware attack that disrupted baggage handling, check-in kiosks, flight displays, Wi-Fi, and online reservation tools. The report notes that this case illustrates how isolated systems in this incident meant that the impact of the attack was comparatively contained.
Lawmakers have sounded the alarm over the fact that a single Chinese company, Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Company (ZPMC), currently dominates the ship-to-shore cranes market, accounting for 80 percent of those used in U.S. ports.
A congressional investigation concluded that some of these cranes had installed unauthorized components, which included cellular modems. Lawmakers have also noted that ZPMC has multiple times requested remote access to the cranes. The company is a subsidiary of a Chinese state-owned communications conglomerate with ties to the Chinese military.
A U.S. Coast Guard review of 90 foreign-made cranes found that, although they posed no unique vulnerabilities, the cranes had the same security weaknesses that often plague such technology systems. These networks can often have poor password policies, unpatched systems, or unnecessary connections to other systems.
The Coast Guard already requires owners and operators of Chinese-made ship-to-shore cranes to eliminate crane connections to the internet and take other risk management actions.
The report recommended an approach wherein port operators ensure that systems can run even when disconnected from networks, and be segmented as much as possible, with strict identity security for all user accounts and automated services, clear visibility into all critical data flow, encryption of sensitive information, and active threat analyses.
It also includes more advanced recommendations, such as tabletop exercises to walk through potential attack scenarios. The nonprofit think tank Gold Institute for International Strategy and cyber security firm Neptune SHIELD hosted one such exercise on June 26 and will do so again at an Oct. 6–9 forum.
The cybersecurity of today extends far beyond the digital space. The disclosure of Volt Typhoon, a Chinese communist regime-backed cyber campaign that has infiltrated U.S. critical infrastructure systems and is pre-positioned to cause disruption, showed a significant escalation in Chinese state-sponsored cyber activity from espionage and IP theft to a potential willingness to cause widespread physical damage.
Brad Medairy, executive vice president for National Security and Cyber, said that as the United States becomes a bigger cyber target, there should be a shift in approach to provide deterrence.
“Our national attack surface is continuing to expand, our risk posture continues to get bigger,” Medairy said at the July 31 event. “We should not accept the fact that the PRC is pre-positioning capabilities in our critical infrastructure that could cause us harm. We shouldn’t accept that the PRC is attacking our telecommunication infrastructure, our defense industrial base.”
McCrary Institute Director Frank Cilluffo agreed. “We have been a victim for too long, and we’ve got to get out of that mindset,” he said.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.