The Panama Canal, a man-made marvel connecting the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans, is at the center of a heated debate in Washington. With a growing focus on US national security and trade priorities, former President Donald Trump has floated the idea of returning the canal to American control.
Republican Congressman Dusty Johnson recently introduced the Panama Canal Repurchase Act to kickstart negotiations. But can the U.S. really regain control over this critical waterway? Here’s a closer look at why this proposal is gaining attention, what it aims to accomplish, and the potential roadblocks ahead.
The Panama Canal plays a major role in global trade and is especially important for the U.S. economy. Approximately 40% of U.S. container exports pass through the canal. In total, about 73% of its traffic consists of American imports and exports. pic.twitter.com/5wTMWHPILi
— JD Rucker (@JDRucker) January 27, 2025
Why the Panama Canal Matters
The Panama Canal plays a major role in global trade and is especially important for the U.S. economy. Approximately 40% of U.S. container exports pass through the canal. In total, about 73% of its traffic consists of American imports and exports. These numbers highlight its strategic value not just for trade but for national security as well.
Representative Dusty Johnson emphasized that American energy and agricultural exports rely heavily on the canal. From liquefied natural gas shipments to grain exports, the canal supports industries that drive the U.S. economy. Any disruptions to its operations could have ripple effects that harm American businesses and consumers alike.
Chinese companies currently manage port operations on both ends of the canal, raising concerns about foreign influence in the region. Johnson highlighted China’s growing global presence through its Belt and Road Initiative, which has expanded Chinese control over infrastructure projects worldwide. He argued that keeping the Panama Canal out of Chinese hands should be a top priority for U.S. policymakers.
Trump’s Push for Negotiations
Donald Trump’s call to repurchase the Panama Canal is rooted in his broader strategy to reduce America’s trade deficit and prioritize national security. The proposed repurchase aligns with his long-standing focus on reviving domestic industries by ensuring reliable trade infrastructure.
Although Panama’s government has stated the canal isn’t available for repurchase, proponents of the plan see negotiations as a first step. Representative Johnson, who has a background in business, believes that even skeptical parties can reach a deal through meaningful discussions. Johnson expressed confidence in Trump’s deal-making abilities, adding that opening talks with Panama could eventually lead to a mutually beneficial agreement.
Key Concerns and Challenges
The prospect of repurchasing the Panama Canal faces significant hurdles, both politically and diplomatically. Panama sees the canal as a core part of its national sovereignty, which means any proposal to transfer control would likely be met with resistance. Additionally, the complex legal and financial implications of such a deal are not yet clear.
There are concerns over the role of the Chinese Communist Party in the canal’s operations. Chinese firms currently control major ports on both the Atlantic and Pacific sides. While this arrangement doesn’t grant Beijing full control of the canal, it underscores China’s increasing influence in critical trade chokepoints. U.S. officials worry this could pose long-term risks to national security and trade interests.
Could Military Options Be on the Table?
One idea that has surfaced is whether the U.S. military would play a role in regaining control of the canal. However, Rep. Johnson was clear that his bill aims to start negotiations—not take military action. He stressed that respecting Panama’s sovereignty is a central tenet of his proposal. While others have floated the idea of military involvement, Johnson’s legislation focuses strictly on building a framework for diplomatic discussions.
What’s Next for the Panama Canal Repurchase Act?
The journey to repurchase the Panama Canal, if it happens, will be a long one. Johnson’s bill is just the first step, authorizing the President to engage in talks with Panama. Whether these discussions result in a deal remains uncertain, but they signal a renewed interest in securing the canal’s role in U.S. trade and security.
The broader context—such as the U.S.-China rivalry and evolving global trade patterns—adds additional urgency to the debate. As discussions continue, policymakers will need to weigh the economic and security benefits of repurchasing the canal against the diplomatic complexities involved.
Conclusion
The Panama Canal has been a cornerstone of global trade since its completion in 1914, and its role in U.S. economic and security strategies cannot be overstated. While reasserting control over the canal is a controversial and complex proposition, it’s clear why leaders like Donald Trump and Dusty Johnson see it as a topic worth pursuing.
With tensions over foreign influence and trade deficits growing, the Panama Canal Repurchase Act could mark the start of a significant shift in how the U.S. approaches strategic infrastructure. Whether this effort succeeds or not, the debate underscores the importance of securing reliable trade routes and reducing vulnerabilities in an increasingly interconnected world.
Video summary generated with assistance from AI.
Independent Journalism Is Dying
Ever since President Trump’s miraculous victory, we’ve heard an incessant drumbeat about how legacy media is dying. This is true. The people have awakened to the reality that they’re being lied to by the self-proclaimed “Arbiters of Truth” for the sake of political expediency, corporate self-protection, and globalist ambitions.
But even as independent journalism rises to fill the void left by legacy media, there is still a huge challenge. Those at the top of independent media like Joe Rogan, Dan Bongino, and Tucker Carlson are thriving and rightly so. They have earned their audience and the financial rewards that come from it. They’ve taken risks and worked hard to get to where they are.
For “the rest of us,” legacy media and their proxies are making it exceptionally difficult to survive, let alone thrive. They still have a stranglehold over the “fact checkers” who have a dramatic impact on readership and viewership. YouTube, Facebook, and Google still stifle us. The freer speech platforms like Rumble and 𝕏 can only reward so many of their popular content creators. For independent journalists on the outside looking in, our only recourse is to rely on affiliates and sponsors.
But even as it seems nearly impossible to make a living, there are blessings that should not be disregarded. By highlighting strong sponsors who share our America First worldview, we have been able to make lifelong connections and even a bit of revenue to help us along. This is why we enjoy symbiotic relationships with companies like MyPillow, Jase Medical, and Promised Grounds. We help them with our recommendations and they reward us with money when our audience buys from them.
The same can be said about our preparedness sponsor, Prepper All-Naturals. Their long-term storage beef has a 25-year shelf life and is made with one ingredient: All-American Beef.
Even our faith-driven precious metals sponsor helps us tremendously while also helping Americans protect their life’s savings. We are blessed to work with them.
Independent media is the future. In many ways, that future is already here. While the phrase, “the more the merrier,” does not apply to this business because there are still some bad actors in the independent media field, there are many great ones that do not get nearly enough attention. We hope to change that one content creator at a time.
Thank you and God Bless,
JD Rucker
It may be wiser to just buy Panama and make it the 51st state. Not only would we control the canal, but we would have a much smaller border to control the migrants from South Amaerica.
Why does your article dated 1/27/25 refer to the suggestion by former president Trump to reacquire the canal?
Since Carter sold the Panama Canal for a dollar, we should adjust for inflation value appreciation and give them two dollars and never relinquish it to anybody again
I recently transited the Canal and was told that Panama relies on the US for military protection. Panama does not have a military.
Of course the communist chinese would love to replace the US military.
The communist have big container facilities on both ends of the canal. No telling what they are bringing in those containers. All they have to do is sink a ship in each of the lock systems and that would be the end of shipping there.