Summary
-
Historical Precedence: The idea of the U.S. acquiring Greenland has historical backing, with previous U.S. presidents like Andrew Johnson and Harry Truman showing interest in buying the island.
-
International Law: Greenland has a right under international law to choose its future, as it was once a non-self-governing territory listed under Chapter XI of the UN Charter. This status implies that Greenland could decide to align more closely with the U.S.
-
Geopolitical Benefits: Greenland’s strategic location between the U.S. and Russia, its long Atlantic coasts, and the potential opening of the Northwest Passage make it geopolitically significant.
-
Resource Wealth: The island is rich in rare earth metals, crucial for modern technologies, particularly those involving national security.
-
Legal Options: Various models exist for how Greenland could become closer to the U.S., from outright purchase if it declares independence to forming a compact similar to those with Micronesia or the Marshall Islands.
-
Trump’s Strategy: President-elect Trump’s interest in Greenland is seen as part of a broader strategy to reorient U.S. foreign policy towards securing influence in the Western Hemisphere and countering moves by China and Russia in the Arctic.
-
Public and Political Reaction: Despite initial skepticism and opposition from Denmark and Greenland’s leadership, there are arguments that a closer relationship with the U.S. could be beneficial, especially considering Greenland’s push towards independence and economic development.
-
Potential for Success: The article concludes that Trump’s plan has the potential to succeed given the historical, legal, and strategic contexts, suggesting that international law and U.S. constitutional practices could accommodate such a move.
Article
Greenland coming closer to the United States has solid precedents in both international law and our own constitutional system.
President-elect Donald Trump’s suggestion that the United States explore a closer relationship with Greenland — up to and including that immense territory, the largest island in the world, joining the Union — epitomizes his out-of-the-box thinking. President Trump deployed that sort of thinking to powerful effect in his first term in office. It’s how he tackled such seemingly insoluble problems as energy supply, immigration, and Middle East peace.
The president-elect’s Greenland suggestion has triggered predictable hyperventilation and pearl-clutching among editorial page writers and elites in Washington, D.C., and foreign capitals alike. However, the United States getting closer to Greenland has obvious geopolitical benefits — and less obvious but strong grounding in international law. Let’s unpack the geopolitics and then the international law.
Greenland holds a crucial position facing the Arctic Ocean, and the Arctic Ocean is a focal point of growing contestation over the vast natural resources that its seabed contains. Russia is maneuvering aggressively to dominate the Arctic, a challenge to the United States that Greenland would help meet.
Greenland itself contains important wealth, not least of all rare earth metals. China seeks to corner the market on rare earth metals because these are indispensable to a range of technologies critical to American national security. Greenland would help with rare earth metals. […]
— Read More: thefederalist.com
Independent Journalism Is Dying
Ever since President Trump’s miraculous victory, we’ve heard an incessant drumbeat about how legacy media is dying. This is true. The people have awakened to the reality that they’re being lied to by the self-proclaimed “Arbiters of Truth” for the sake of political expediency, corporate self-protection, and globalist ambitions.
But even as independent journalism rises to fill the void left by legacy media, there is still a huge challenge. Those at the top of independent media like Joe Rogan, Dan Bongino, and Tucker Carlson are thriving and rightly so. They have earned their audience and the financial rewards that come from it. They’ve taken risks and worked hard to get to where they are.
For “the rest of us,” legacy media and their proxies are making it exceptionally difficult to survive, let alone thrive. They still have a stranglehold over the “fact checkers” who have a dramatic impact on readership and viewership. YouTube, Facebook, and Google still stifle us. The freer speech platforms like Rumble and 𝕏 can only reward so many of their popular content creators. For independent journalists on the outside looking in, our only recourse is to rely on affiliates and sponsors.
But even as it seems nearly impossible to make a living, there are blessings that should not be disregarded. By highlighting strong sponsors who share our America First worldview, we have been able to make lifelong connections and even a bit of revenue to help us along. This is why we enjoy symbiotic relationships with companies like MyPillow, Jase Medical, and Promised Grounds. We help them with our recommendations and they reward us with money when our audience buys from them.
The same can be said about our preparedness sponsor, Prepper All-Naturals. Their long-term storage beef has a 25-year shelf life and is made with one ingredient: All-American Beef.
Even our faith-driven precious metals sponsor helps us tremendously while also helping Americans protect their life’s savings. We are blessed to work with them.
Independent media is the future. In many ways, that future is already here. While the phrase, “the more the merrier,” does not apply to this business because there are still some bad actors in the independent media field, there are many great ones that do not get nearly enough attention. We hope to change that one content creator at a time.
Thank you and God Bless,
JD Rucker
