(DCNF)—Attorney Alan Dershowitz said on Newsmax Thursday that the Supreme Court is unlikely to side with President Donald Trump if he pursues a plan to send American inmates to foreign prisons.
Trump said his administration is actively considering sending U.S. citizens to prisons in El Salvador during remarks ahead of a press briefing with El Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele. During an appearance on “The Record with Greta Van Susteren,” Dershowitz said the idea of transferring U.S. citizens to facilities in countries like El Salvador, where reports of torture and gang killings persist, would likely run afoul of the Constitution’s prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment.
“The writ of habeas corpus is constitutionally guaranteed. It can be only suspended under certain circumstances. So I don’t think this is going to end up the way President Trump wants it to end up,” Dershowitz said, explaining how habeas rights apply outside the U.S. “But he said, look, he’s going to explore the law. And if he calls me, I’ll tell him I think it’s unconstitutional. Maybe others would tell him it’s constitutional. And he tests the limits all the time.
While Dershowitz said that sending inmates to countries with reputable legal systems, like Italy, might pose different legal questions, he said the odds are overwhelmingly against courts allowing transfers to nations known for brutal prison conditions.
“We’ll see what the courts hold. My prediction is the courts will not permit American citizens who are convicted of crime to be sent to foreign countries where they could be exposed to cruel and unusual punishment. Now, what if he decides to send them to Italy, which has a decent legal system, or some other countries that have decent prisons and decent jails? That would pose a somewhat different problem,” Dershowitz said. “We’ve already sent prisoners to Guantanamo, which is American territory rented from Cuba, but not really American territory. So it’s not 100 percent certain, but I would say it’s 90 percent certain that the courts will not uphold sending American citizens to foreign countries in which they could be subject to cruel and unusual punishment.”
Dershowitz also discussed the death penalty being ruled unconstitutional, recalling how he drafted the first opinion striking it down under the Eighth Amendment while clerking for Justice Arthur Goldberg. Although the Supreme Court later reversed course, he said the definition of cruel and unusual punishment remains subjective and dependent on the degree of harm involved.
“I wrote the first draft of the first opinion declaring the death penalty unconstitutional on cruel and unusual punishment grounds. I did it when I was a law clerk for Justice Goldberg,” Dershowitz said. “And then a few years later, the Supreme Court resurrected it and said the death penalty, if administered in certain ways, is not cruel and unusual for certain crimes. But it’s a matter of degree. And I think the idea of sending them to prisons in El Salvador, where we know torture occurs and gang killings occur, would be very difficult for the Supreme Court to accept.”
This discussion follows Trump’s meeting with Bukele, where the two addressed the detention of illegal migrants sent to El Salvador, including MS-13 suspect Kilmar Armando Abrego Garcia. The Trump administration argued it has no obligation to bring Garcia back to the United States.
In recent court filings, the Justice Department said federal courts lack the authority to interfere in foreign policy matters, including decisions about Garcia’s deportation and imprisonment. ICE apprehended Garcia in March and deported him to El Salvador, where he was placed in a prison designed for gang members. Authorities linked him to MS-13 after a 2019 arrest in Maryland and information from a confidential informant.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.
They are not US citizens, that’s the whole reason he’s sending them there! Get with it Dersh!
No, he wants to send actual US citizens to foreign prisons. I cannot be on board with this.
If sending American prisoners to foreign country prisons were legalized, I would be you would see a dramatic drop in crime everywhere in America. Prisons with no TV, no basketball, no weights, no fun at all, just real prisons.
A far greater deterrent to crime is the certainty of punishment not the severity.
Dershowitz is a pedo and pedo protector in chief.
Why send them to another country. You can get a lot more abuse & torture by just locking them up in Washington DC’s Gulag!
I have no interest in anything Dersh says. He’s wrong a lot. He speculates a lot.
Dersh was closely associated with Epstein. And, he is Israel first.
President Trump could designate a prison in El Salvador as a U.S. embassy. That would make it technically “American soil “ and sending criminals there would not be sending them to be held “in a foreign country.”
I think adult U.S. citizens should be able to sell their citizenship to an acceptable green card/citizenship seeker. Maybe five years between entry and citizenship. They must maintain their citizenship in their home country in case they do anything deserving of deportation.
The American would have to renounce their U.S. citizenship and have a foreign passport before they would get the money from the sale. They would have one year to pay the money to the US to reclaim their citizenship. The money does not get refunded to the immigrant who bought their entry. After that they would have to purchase it back at market rates or no coming back. Barred from entry for five years. After that they are treated like any other foreigner.
Minimum price is $100k. U.S. operates citizen brokerage. I’ve asked people around me what would you sell your U.S. citizenship for? They look at me like I’m crazy. I say $1,000,000. Would you leave the U.S. for a million dollars? They still look at me like I’m nuts.
If we allowed currently incarcerated prisoners to sell their citizenship and leave would they take it? This is not compulsory, it’s just an option. They can go to the head of the line as a form of reparations.
This platform could help self-finance a lot of the America lasters out of the country so we can have some peace and quiet.
In exchange, we get someone who values being an American enough to pay at least $100k and come in legally.