(The Burning Platform)—This week, Your News to Know rounds up the latest top stories involving gold and the overall economy. Stories include: The surprising motives behind inflation, unpacking central bank gold buying figures for 2023, and Turkey is becoming the world’s top consumer of gold out of necessity.
If inflation is bad, why do we have an inflation goal?
Egon von Greyerz recently analyzed the state of economic affairs. From gold to climate, a lot of the points he raises are striking, yet not likely to be covered by any mainstream outlet. His discussion of inflation, or rather its source, caught my eye.
We know the Federal Reserve has an inflation target of 2% annually. In recent years, they’ve missed that target consistently (from 390% over to today’s mere 60% over target). Inflation has been so high for so long that even getting back to 2% feels like victory.
von Greyerz addresses the elephant in the room: Why is the inflation rate not 0%? We should also address the most frightening of boogeymen, too… Why is deflation so terrifying?
First, you must understand that a 2% inflation target is a recipe for deliberate, sustained wealth destruction. So you’d think there would be a very compelling reason behind it! Yet when asked this very question recently in a Senate hearing, Fed Chair Jerome Powell said:
The 2% is globally agreed between all major central banks as a target.
When asked how that is beneficial to the people, Powell went on to reveal the true depths of the Federal Reserve’s policy:
I will tell you how it does, I guess it is obviously not obvious how that is… To have people believe that it will go back to 2% anchors inflation there.
Let me translate the Chairman’s responses into English:
- 2% inflation is our target because it’s everyone else’s target
- There’s no actual benefit to 2% inflation beyond expectations
If this doesn’t make you question the competence of those involved in managing your money, then nothing will.
Since understanding the alleged benefits of 2% inflation is “obviously not obvious,” here’s a brief Q&A:
What causes inflation?
An increase in the supply of currency – which, by itself, decreases the currency’s purchasing power. Rising prices are a symptom of inflation rather than inflation itself.
Is inflation going down?
No, but recently inflation is going up less quickly. Remember, inflation is cumulative. After a year of 9% inflation, your currency has lost 9% of its purchasing power permanently. Even if inflation drops to 0%, that lost 9% is gone forever.
How does raising interest rates help inflation?
Higher interest rates make borrowing more expensive and encourage saving rather than spending. Less credit and more saving decreases overall economic activity by reducing the amount of currency chasing goods and services. Higher interest rates don’t, by themselves, reduce the overall supply of currency, but they do discourage spending.
Why is deflation bad?
Deflation is literally a reduction in the circulating currency supply – which increases the purchasing power of the currency. That may not sound bad to you (unless you have a lot of debt). Deflation encourages saving money, which lowers overall economic activity. Worse, though, deflation forces debtors to use more valuable currency to repay their creditors. The more you owe, the worse deflation is for you – and if you owe, say, $32 trillion, it’s a recipe for disaster… Just as inflation encourages borrowing and spending, deflation encourages the opposite.
To continue: von Greyerz believes the world is turning away from IOU-based currencies. The reason for this is straightforward: the debt is simply becoming unsustainable, and it gets worse the higher up we go from the average citizen to governments themselves. One might say that the world’s credit score is becoming insufficient to support the current, debt-based global economy.
This is a key reason BRICS nations are interested in creating a commodity-backed currency. A commodity has intrinsic value – it’s desirable because of the thing itself, rather than because of a promise from a government. In this way, von Greyerz also inadvertently explains why BRICS economies want to rule the world all of a sudden. In a shift away from unbacked paper money and towards tangible assets, these global commodities exporters are real economic powerhouses.
The transition away from unbacked, debt-based liability currency to commodities-backed money won’t be easy. Expect a decade of high inflation, high interest rates, geopolitical turbulence and economic volatility. To navigate this “new normal,” von Greyerz recommends physical gold and silver (as well as a few industrial commodities) as the only assets likely to endure the chaotic decade ahead.
Central bank gold buying still up (if we exclude profit-taking)
Central bank gold demand down 39% vs. last year? Such a claim merits scrutiny.
On the heels of a record year (central banks bought 1,136 tons of gold in 2022), why the sudden about-face?
As IMF data reveals, three countries are responsible for the sell-off: Turkey, Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan.
Turkey was the largest gold buyer last year with over 125 tons, but has reportedly sold 59 tons in the first five months of this year. Turkey’s case has already been covered in full. The nation is selling gold bullion to prop up its currency. The results, so far, have been mixed.
Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan’s cases are less clear, with the former having sold 35 tons and the later 27 tons of gold. Notably, unlike Turkey, they were also net sellers last year. Both nations have large gold reserves (#15 and #17 largest) in relation to their economies. I suspect the motive is simply profit-taking.
Who are the buyers, then? Singapore bought 69 tons and China 68 tons during the period. We’ve covered in reasonable depth how China’s gold-buying reports appear to be a message to the world. It has been suspected for the longest time that China’s real holdings far exceed the reported figure, and that the country isn’t particularly concerned with reporting its gold purchases to the public.
This narrative is especially strengthened when one takes into account that most of the 1,136 tons were from countries unrevealed, with China being one of the few willing to disclose its central bank policy. Singapore has retained a similar air of secrecy – any attempt to get an explanation from its central bank was met with vague or secretive responses.
Not the case with Poland, this year’s third-largest gold buyer (and world’s #22 largest gold reserve). Sharing borders with Ukraine and Belarus, I’m personally not at all surprised to see Poland adding more gold to its reserves.
In times of geopolitical uncertainty, gold as always serves as the ultimate form of payment or collateral. Let’s hope the Ukraine conflict doesn’t spread to Poland – but if it does, the nation will, at least, have taken steps to diversify its savings with a heavy allocation to gold as insurance against crisis.
The collapse of the lira and Turkey’s massive consumer gold demand
It feels like any story of Turkish gold selling should be accompanied by the full economic picture. For example, the 165 tons of gold sold by the country within three months were actually sold to Turkish citizens. This was necessary to meet local demand as the country banned gold imports amid trade disagreements with the European Union.
Surprising, isn’t it? The biggest central bank gold seller this year has sold its gold reserves to its own citizens!
But there’s quite a bit more to the story of Turkey’s economic weirdness. Erdogan seems determined to play Russian roulette with Turkey’s economy. Instead of raising interest rates to fight rising prices, he has instead lowered them. Turkey currently misses the technical definition of hyperinflation by a whisker, after enduring 50% or higher monthly price increases for all of 2022. The most recent report puts inflation at a blistering 48% monthly.
Economic insanity aside, the earthquake in Turkey reminded us of something that doesn’t get mentioned often enough in the gold market: Gold and real estate are both tangible assets, but they aren’t the same. The latter comes with so much risk, including counterparty and environmental, that it can’t be classified with gold. Both are tangible assets with intrinsic value – beyond that, they’re completely different.
Unsurprisingly, Turkish citizens loaded up on gold bars and gold coins. (Unlike gold jewelry, these are classified as “gold for investment.”) In fact, the world’s 19th largest economy accounted for 1/3 of global demand for investment gold in the second quarter of the year.
The Turkish people are suffering economically – but fortunately, they’re spending their money as quickly as they can to secure a lasting store of value with gold.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.