The members of the BRICS bloc of major emerging economies have recently met to decide on adding new members and creating a common currency to challenge the United States dollar.
The five nations that make up BRICS – Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa – represent more than 40 percent of the global population, and their share of the world economy – when measured in purchasing power parity – outperforms that of the American-led G7 bloc.
Once viewed simply as a loose association of disparate emerging economies seeking to find a way to make it easier to sign trade deals with one another, BRICS has in recent years taken on a more concrete shape as an economic bloc that stands in opposition to the West.
The foreign ministers of BRICS met in South Africa on June 1 and 2 for a summit along with senior officials from more than a dozen other nations looking to forge closer links with the BRICS bloc, either by signing lucrative deals or by joining the group. (Related: BRICS to lay foundation for EXPANSION: 13 Nations formally asked to join group, 6 others expressed interest.)
Eight countries sent representatives to Cape Town for a talk with the BRICS bloc, known as the “Friends of BRICS” discussions. These eight are Comoros, Cuba, the Democratic Republic of the Congo, Gabon, Iran, Kazakhstan, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. Five other nations – Argentina, Bangladesh, Egypt, Guinea-Bissau and Indonesia – participated in the discussions virtually.
These are just some of the nations that have formally expressed their desire to join the bloc. Other prospecting nations include Mexico, Nigeria and Turkey.
Indian Foreign Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar remarked that some of the talks included deliberations on the guiding principles, standards, criteria and procedures of what an expanded BRICS bloc would look like. No set standards were released, as these are still a “work in progress,” according to Jaishankar.
South African Minister of Foreign Affairs Naledi Pandor said the foreign ministers were aiming to complete work on a framework for admitting new members and submitting them for the approval of BRICS leaders before they meet for a summit in Johannesburg, South Africa in August.
If the group does expand, BRICS is expected to provide other emerging economies with a platform to advocate for their interests and coordinate action contributing to each other’s economic growth. This will help BRICS in its ultimate goal of providing a credible alternative to the benefits offered by the current Western-led economic order.
BRICS to continue work on creating new currency
In light of the West’s weaponization of sanctions following Russia’s special military operation in Ukraine, BRICS has taken the lead in discussing creating a new currency that all member nations could use in international transactions.
The use of alternative currencies was among the prominent talking points during the recent BRICS meeting, with member nations discussing how this potential new currency could shield other member countries from the impact of Western sanctions.
Pandor noted that BRICS is looking to “ensure that we do not become victims to sanctions that have secondary effects on countries that have no involvement in issues that have led to those unilateral sanctions.”
Analysts have noted that BRICS members are also interested in pushing for a common currency to usher in a non-dollar-denominated world with multiple reserve currencies, which they believe would give them more autonomy in terms of internal policies. Without a common currency, for now, these nations are striving to sign trade agreements that settle payments in their own currencies.
India, for example, already has agreements with at least 18 countries, including Russia, to settle certain international transactions in Indian rupees. China has already signed currency swap deals with several nations, including Brazil, to allow them to conduct trade in the Chinese yuan to reduce the cost of bilateral trade and limit their exposure to fluctuations in the value of the American dollar.
In the New Development Bank, the Shanghai-based multinational bank created by BRICS, bank chief and former President of Brazil Dilma Rousseff revealed that the bank is gradually moving away from the dollar and is promising at least 30 percent of loans to be conducted in the local currencies of member states.
“It’s about financial independence and sovereignty,” said South African Ambassador to BRICS Anil Sooklal. “These countries want greater determination in terms of investments, trade and financing sources. They don’t have to be straitjacketed into a certain currency or financial institution.”
Several BRICS nations have already brought up proposals, which are being considered by officials at the New Development Bank. Pandor said the bloc “will be guided to them as to what the future model might be,” without providing any further details.
Learn more about the global shift away from primarily using the American dollar at DollarDemise.com.
Watch this video discussing BRICS’ potential expansion and its pitch for the creation of a common currency.
This video is from the Thrive Time Show channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- World moving on from US dollar amid failed Biden presidency as BRICS countries announce they will adopt their own currency.
- De-dollarization efforts continue: BRICS member nations to discuss COMMON CURRENCY in August meeting.
- Two dozen countries align against US dollar as BRICS alliance seeks to form new global currency.
- BRICS nations rapidly working to create common currency to counter US dollar’s global hegemony.
- Potential BRICS expansion could mark end of dollar as world’s pre-eminent currency.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.