Hundreds of Burger King restaurants in the United States are going to disappear in the months ahead as the company reports the bankruptcy of some of its biggest operators. A series of challenges are threatening its empire as one of the largest fast food chains in America and the world right now.
New data reveals that Burger King is falling behind major rivals, including McDonald’s, Taco Bell, and Wendy’s, as revenue shrinks and its restaurants continue to lose popularity amongst US consumers. The numbers indicate that the company’s problems are getting exponentially worse in 2023. That’s why today, we are going to expose the factors that are accelerating the demise of this popular brand.
Not one or two, but three major Burger King operators have filed for bankruptcy so far this year. The biggest franchisees in the state of Ohio, Utah, and Michigan have reported severe cash flow problems and a steep decline in foot traffic, sales volumes, and profits for years. They have been operating several stores at a loss, and about 400 of them are going to close doors for good this year. In addition, the company’s executives shuttered 124 underperforming locations between January and May, and another 63 restaurants were eliminated from its portfolio last month, according to reports released by Restaurant Dive.
In all, roughly 10% of Burger King’s 7,400 locations in America are likely to disappear in 2023, industry estimates reveal. Right now, corporate executives are pressuring collapsing franchisees to sell their stores to other operators instead of closing them, which could result in financial losses to the tune of $300 million. Last month, the company joined a filing alongside various creditors and vendors, to force a sale of the remaining units managed by struggling franchisees.
The fast food chain’s US store profitability has been declining for over a decade now. In fact, between 2010 and 2020, Burger King’s annual revenue decreased by 36%. In 2010, the brand made an average revenue of $2.5 billion, whereas that number was only $1.9 billion in 2022. Even before the COVID-19 Pandemic Burger King began to see a concerning decline in revenue. For instance, between 2012-2013 alone, the company’s revenue fell by 41.6%.
The Buy One, Get One for $1 and 2 for $6 promotions on Whoppers and chicken and fish sandwiches proved to be much less popular than the 2 for $5 deal the chain had in 2020, creating a “considerable year-over-year gap” in BK’s earnings.
Despite the strategy shifts announced by the chain, those moves didn’t seem to be enough to help effectively boost its sales. In June, Burger King’s domestic same-store sales grew by 1.1%, but this was a very disappointing gain when compared to its biggest competitor McDonald’s, which grew its sales by 15%. Not to mention, Burger King lost its spot as America’s second-largest burger chain. In 2021, Wendy’s surpassed Burger King to become the nation’s No. 2 burger chain by sales. According to Technomic data, Wendy’s system sales increased by 4.8% last year. Burger King, meanwhile, dropped by 5.4% to $9.6 billion.
It’s clear that the industry giant is not as financially healthy as we all thought and if there’s something that we learned from the retail apocalypse and the bank collapses of earlier this year is that there’s no company that’s too big to fail. A few bad quarters can bring down an empire that has been built over decades, let’s just hope that’s not the case with Burger King.
Article and Video cross-posted from Epic Economist.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.
too bad. I’ve always preferred their burgers to McD’s
Good burgers if you like the taste of charcoal.
The local McDonalds has lines around the block at breakfast and lunch. The local Burger King has zero cars with 1-2 customers in the dining room around the same times of day. I’m betting this BK is a goner!
We got a brand new one here in my town. Their service is awful. They’ll close soon I expect.
A real article would have explored possible explanations and spoken to franchisees to understand the problem from their perspective. Here are my guesses: Many locations are in undesirable areas. The menu is stagnant with no innovation or new products. Food quality is mediocre. Promotion and advertising are nonexistent. Management and staff are poorly trained and unmotivated. But who knows?
How would they grift off your observation?
Most know the why already. It’s all in the grift, gotta make that cheddar.
Stopped eating at BK a few years ago when they went out of their way to insult conservatives. I forget the exact circumstances now, but they became extremely political. About the time the impossible burger came out.
I had a Whopper recently after about 15 years. It didn’t taste the same as I remembered and I threw most of it away. The char-broil flavor was totally absent and it was just bland.
How to fix BK?
1) Get rid of the creepy King in your commercials. The “Big Headed” King was somewhat cute for 1 or 2 commercials 15 years ago…..now it’s a semi-gay, creepy thing.
2) Lower the prices across the board.
3) Automate the ordering process, thereby cutting staff.
4) Keep the restaurant CLEAN. Nobody wants to eat at a place that looks or smells like a dump.
Nobody local eats @ our BK. They hire tattooed ladies, and when that arm comes out the window with your food, it churns your stomach. You drive straight to the exit and shitcan it on the way out. You leave hungry. The only people that eat there aren’t locals.
Oh no, was it the Pride Whopper that started all of this? Or was it donating to LGBTQs for every chicken sandwich it sold on Sundays with a smirk in the direction of Chick-fil-a? Other than those two things I can’t imagine why this is happening.
Politics always comes back to bite them in the arse. Just keep your pie-hole shut.
It’s beginning to look more and more like Taco Bell will be fast food king after the fast food wars are over. So far McDonalds and Burger King are the causalities. Just like Demolition Man. Electric cars, no guns just zapper sticks, instant ticket dispensers for word violations…the three sea shells are next people get ready!
They should change the closing stores to drive-thru only format, like Checkers and Rally’s. With outdoor seating. Less overhead on smaller lot sizes too.
I ceased to be a customer when Ronald McDonald and The King were kissing. The Whopper was good, better than the cardboard from McDonalds. The fries are so-so and my dog won’t eat the chicken nuggets. Drive through service was slow.Taken together the King is not the king anymore. I patronize local burger joints, not the chain stores. Much better food and no woke politics.
A year or so ago their CFO came out as woke homosexual supporting puke and took a shot at Chic Filet. I stopped going to Burger King and maybe others did too for the same reason.
Bidenomics at work!