(The Daily Signal)—As Earth Day approaches on Tuesday, climate activists remind us of the importance of cutting carbon emissions. Yet, one inconvenient truth escapes their green-tinged talking points: The rise of natural gas in our power sector is the No. 1 driver of the reduction of emissions in the United States—not wind or solar.
If we want affordable and reliable power while being responsible stewards of the environment, natural gas is our most significant comparative advantage in the United States.
Between 2005 and 2019, the U.S. reduced carbon dioxide emissions by more than 800 million metric tons. The U.S. Energy Information Administration credits nearly two-thirds of that reduction to natural gas.
Zoom in more closely, and you’ll find the same trend in Pennsylvania. The Keystone State—a powerhouse of energy production thanks to the development of the Marcellus Shale, and the second largest producer of natural gas in the nation—reduced its power-sector carbon emissions by nearly 11% in one year—the most significant year-over-year drop in decades.
Its emissions success story also comes from a market transition from coal to natural gas. Natural gas comprises 60% of Pennsylvania’s power generation, while 31% comes from nuclear, 5% from coal, and 4% from renewables (wind and solar). With this resource mix, Pennsylvania is one of only three states in the region that have successfully reduced emissions while increasing energy production.
Natural gas production in the Marcellus Shale region propelled the United States from being a net importer to the world’s largest exporter of natural gas. Today, Pennsylvania is the country’s top exporter of electricity.
Yet top Democrats—and some Republicans—remain duty-bound to the climate agenda and green energy donors. Instead of celebrating natural gas as a boon to both our energy independence and the environment, climate alarmists continue to vilify the industry. And by doing so, Pennsylvania Democrats continue to lash out against the sector that’s been giving Pennsylvania a competitive advantage.
For starters, former Gov. Tom Wolf entered Pennsylvania into the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative through an unconstitutional executive order in 2019. The initiative is a multistate cap-and-trade program intended to force states to lower their carbon emissions through a carbon tax placed on energy producers and, ultimately, consumers through increased energy prices. Some estimates suggest the initiative will cost the commonwealth up to 22,000 energy jobs and raise consumers’ electricity bills by a whopping 30%.
Fortunately, good constitutional governance intervened. The Commonwealth Court ruled that Wolf’s actions were illegal, stating clearly that a governor has no authority to unilaterally levy taxes without legislative approval. Gov. Josh Shapiro, Wolf’s successor, took up the torch and appealed the decision. The Pennsylvania Supreme Court will hear oral arguments about the legality of Pennsylvania’s entry into the initiative on May 13. The initiative remains dormant while litigation is ongoing.
All litigation aside, the fact remains that Pennsylvania’s participation in a scheme like the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative is completely unnecessary. The Keystone State already has a proven track record of reducing emissions without causing energy scarcity simply by following the market-led push for natural gas. Greater natural gas development has brought the state greater energy independence, more reliable electricity, stable jobs, and—much to the chagrin of climate activists—fewer carbon emissions.
In fact, Pennsylvania has reduced its emissions more efficiently than states that are already participating in the initiative. Between 2018 and 2023, Pennsylvania’s emissions dropped nine million metric tons. Meanwhile, New York—a member of the initiative and a state with about 6 million more people than Pennsylvania—dropped only 1 million metric tons.
Moreover, states participating in the Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative are struggling to contain costs. The Department of Environmental Protection in New Jersey, a state that is one of the initiative’s original charter members, noted that “participating RGGI states already have some of the highest retail electricity rates in the nation, with six of the nine states in the top 10, and increased energy costs should be of major concern.” Carbon taxes touch every corner of the economy and raise costs for families and businesses.
To avoid the initiative’s inevitable fallout, some Democrats have tried to cleverly rebrand the scheme. For example, Shapiro rebranded the Democrat’s climate agenda through a series of new green-energy efforts known as the Lightning Plan. Layered inside this plan is the Pennsylvania Climate Emissions Reduction Act, Shapiro’s homegrown, state-specific version of the initiative. His new agenda diminishes the natural gas industry’s role that led the commonwealth toward cleaner, more reliable energy.
But just like every Green New Deal knockoff, Shapiro’s policy package lacks political acumen. All these proposals—which prop up less-reliable energy sources by setting mandates for renewable energy usage and enact burdensome red tape that slows down permitting and production for fuels like oil and natural gas—put energy security at risk and cost Americans in terms of jobs and energy prices.
On Election Day 2024, voters rejected the Left’s climate alarmist agenda in Pennsylvania and elsewhere. Those who remained skeptical of former Vice President Kamala Harris’ flip-flop on fracking for oil and natural gas instead embraced President Donald Trump’s “drill, baby, drill” strategy.
Natural gas will help usher in a new era of American energy dominance—one that’s more reliable, secure, affordable, and—despite what the alarmists claim—cleaner.
So, if there’s one thing that environmentalists should celebrate this Earth Day, it’s natural gas.
We publish a variety of perspectives. Nothing written here is to be construed as representing the views of The Daily Signal.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.