Climate maps released by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) appear to have been manipulated to deceive the people and keep the “global warming” scam going.
Back in May, the NOAA released what it called “very informative” climate maps that display the average temperature across the world in April 2023 compared with the climate normal. However, the Swedish news outlet New Times pointed out that the two parallel maps from the agency contradict each other – even though they used absolutely the same measurement data. Both maps also depart from the official temperature records of many countries for that month, which showed a cooler spring than normal.
The first map released by NOAA displays land and sea temperature changes from the average in April, where the average is calculated based on the 30-year climate norm, in this case the period between 1991 and 2020. It is color-graded on a scale with 0.5-degree accuracy – displaying colder deviations in blue shades, neutral in white and warmer deviations in red. This map is what climate researchers often use.
The second map, which NOAA posted on the website of the National Centers for Environmental Information, is used by the mainstream media when doing climate reports. This “media-adapted map” does not mention temperatures, percentages or any true value. Instead, undefined temperatures are contrasted with an average, which is also not clearly specified, unlike the “researcher version” of the map.
Seeing red: NOAA’s map for the media is “warm” all over
It is worth noting that unlike the first map provided to researchers by NOAA, the second map is almost completely red. The weaker blue shades are very grayish, producing the illusion that everything appears warmer and nothing cooler. It has made a deceitful impression that April is warmer than normal, even in parts of the world where official data is showing the opposite.
Cold and snow records have been set globally for both the winter and spring seasons. All continents have experienced cold and precipitation that substantially differs from the so-called climate normal, which is the average of the identical measurement data over three decades.
A recent examination in detail of temperature, snow and ice data for the months of April and May from around the globe has found numerous interesting variations. Moreover, the winter season’s snow mass and bound water quantity in the northern hemisphere are considerably higher than normal.
As reported by the Canadian climate authority Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC), their own statistics revealed that the amounts of water locked up in the northern hemisphere’s snow mass at the end of April this year add up to about 2,600 cubic kilometers. The norm is only about 1,600 cubic kilometers.
JD’s manually curated links for God-fearing MAGA patriots
This indicates that this winter was over 60 percent more snow-rich than the norm for the period between 1998 and 2011. In at least 13 states, many of which are situated in the southern U.S., the snow covered twice to 4.5 times as wide areas as normal.
“What makes this temperature fraud so serious is that it is used to prove an alleged man-made global warming, a narrative that globalists then use to impose on the world’s governments and populations a total restructuring of society and our lives,” wrote the New Times‘ Christer Ericsson.
“These mandates have already seriously damaged energy and food security, eroding Western treasuries and private economies, and taking away a large part of our freedom and quality of life.”
Watch this video below explaining how the NOAA is pushing junk science.
This video is from the Real Free News channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- NO WARMING AT ALL: Global COOLING continues for eighth straight year, according to NOAA data.
- Is the climate being engineered?
- Weather forecasters: El Niño is coming this summer and will likely stretch into winter.
Sources include:
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.