Editor’s Note: It is this publication’s stance that the UFO phenomenon is not about “aliens.” It seems more likely to be a combination of disinformation to cover up government programs and demonic forces that pose as “extraterrestrials” to promote a coming great deception. With that said, the standard narrative is being promoted by our government and therefore must be covered.
The upcoming congressional hearing on unidentified anomalous phenomena (UAP), set for September 9, promises to push the boundaries of government disclosure further than before.
Titled “Restoring Public Trust Through UAP Transparency and Whistleblower Protection,” the event arrives more than two years after David Grusch’s explosive 2023 testimony that first thrust the issue into the national spotlight. Grusch, a former intelligence official, alleged that the U.S. government and private aerospace companies possess “exotic craft and materials” recovered from crash sites, including what he described as “biologics”—non-human organisms. Those revelations, drawn from interviews with dozens of insiders, sparked widespread calls for accountability and fueled bipartisan frustration over perceived secrecy.
This new hearing, organized by the House Oversight Committee’s national security subcommittee, shifts the focus to firsthand accounts, a move that could lend fresh credibility to long-standing claims. Rep. Eric Burlison (R-Mo.), who represents Missouri’s 7th District and has become a driving force behind these efforts, told The Daily Wire that at least two witnesses will share direct experiences with UAP.
This marks a clear break from earlier sessions, where testimony often relied on relayed stories rather than personal encounters. Burlison’s involvement extends beyond the hearing itself; he’s collaborating with Grusch, now on his staff, to prepare a batch of interrogatory letters aimed at extracting more details from various government and private entities.
Burlison made it clear that these letters represent the real breakthrough. “I want people to know, regardless of how the hearing goes, to me, the most important thing that’s going to come out of it is the interrogatory letters that we will be dropping at the time of the hearing,” he said.
These documents, carrying official weight, could compel responses on everything from retrieval programs to potential national security risks. In an era of eroding trust in federal institutions, Burlison’s push reflects broader concerns about hidden programs wasting taxpayer dollars or compromising defense capabilities—issues that have echoed through prior UFO discussions.
Grusch’s earlier claims set the stage for this moment. During his 2023 appearance before the same subcommittee, he described a “multi-decade UAP crash retrieval and reverse-engineering program” run without congressional oversight.
He stopped short of detailing specifics in public, citing classification, but insisted the evidence pointed to non-human origins. The Pentagon has repeatedly denied these assertions, with spokespeople stating no verifiable proof of extraterrestrial activity or reverse-engineering efforts exists. Yet, Grusch’s testimony, backed by interviews with over 40 military and intelligence veterans, prompted the creation of the All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) to investigate further—though critics argue it remains too opaque.
Building on that foundation, recent hearings have amplified the urgency. In November 2024, witnesses like Luis Elizondo, a former Pentagon counterintelligence officer, testified about advanced technologies monitoring U.S. military sites that defy known human engineering. Elizondo, author of Imminent: Inside the Pentagon’s Hunt for UFOs, claimed the government has recovered nonhuman specimens and operates under excessive secrecy.
“UAP are real. Advanced technologies not made by our Government – or any other government – are monitoring sensitive military installations around the globe,” he stated in prepared remarks.
Retired Navy Rear Adm. Tim Gallaudet added to the chorus, recounting a 2015 naval exercise where a UAP video mysteriously vanished from official emails the day after circulation.
These accounts align with pilot testimonies from years past. Cmdr. David Fravor, during the 2023 hearing, detailed his 2004 encounter off California’s coast: a seamless, tic-tac-shaped object that hovered over the ocean before accelerating beyond comprehension.
“I think what we experienced was, like I said, well beyond the material science and the capabilities that we had at the time, that we have currently or that we’re going to have in the next 10 to 20 years,” Fravor said.
Similarly, Ryan Graves, a former F-18 pilot, described routine sightings of cube-shaped objects inside transparent spheres during East Coast training flights. Such reports, captured on advanced sensors, suggest not isolated anomalies but a pattern warranting serious scrutiny.
As the September 9 hearing approaches—starting at 10 a.m. ET and streaming live on YouTube—lawmakers from both parties continue to demand better reporting mechanisms. The stigma around UAP discussions has faded somewhat, but witnesses like Elizondo warn of retaliation against those who speak out, including what he called “administrative terrorism.” With Burlison’s letters poised to probe deeper, this could be the session that forces long-withheld answers into the open, addressing not just curiosity about the unknown but core questions of transparency and security in American governance.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.