- CT scans may cause 5% of future U.S. cancer cases, with 103,000 cancers projected from 2023 scans alone.
- A single abdominal CT delivers radiation equal to 1,000 chest X-rays, with children facing 10 times higher cancer risks than adults.
- Experts warn of profit-driven overuse, with 93 million scans performed annually and many offering little medical benefit.
- Infants and children are at highest risk, yet parents are rarely informed about long-term cancer dangers.
- Patients should question unnecessary scans, seek radiation-free alternatives, and demand lower-dose options for children.
(Natural News)—Millions of Americans undergo CT scans each year, trusting these high-tech imaging tests to diagnose injuries or illnesses. But shocking new research reveals a dark side to this routine procedure: CT scans may be responsible for 5% of all future cancer cases in the U.S. — equivalent to roughly 103,000 cancers from scans performed in 2023 alone. Experts warn that overuse, profit motives, and lax regulations are exposing patients to dangerous radiation with little benefit.
A landmark study published in JAMA Internal Medicine estimates that CT scans now rival alcohol consumption and obesity as a leading preventable cancer risk. The scans use ionizing radiation, a known carcinogen, with doses varying wildly between machines. For example, an abdominal CT delivers radiation equivalent to 1,000 chest X-rays, while a child’s head CT may carry a 10-fold higher cancer risk than the same scan for an adult.
Dr. Rebecca Smith-Bindman, a radiologist at UC San Francisco and lead study author, bluntly states: “It’s unfathomable. We keep doing more and more CTs, and the doses keep going up.” Her research found that doses for identical scans can vary tenfold between hospitals, with no standardized safety checks.
Profit over patients?
With 93 million CT scans performed annually in the U.S.—a 30% increase since 2007—critics accuse healthcare providers of prioritizing revenue over safety. Each scan costs up to $6,800, creating a lucrative incentive for overuse. Dr. David Johnson, a gastroenterologist at Eastern Virginia Medical School, urges doctors to “hit the pause button on ordering CT scans just because it’s easy and convenient.”
The parallels to other medical controversies are striking. Like COVID-19 vaccines and statins, which critics argue are overprescribed despite risks, CT scans are often deployed as a “default” diagnostic tool.
Infants subjected to CT scans face the highest lifetime cancer risk, with thyroid, lung, and breast cancers most likely to develop later in life. Yet parents are rarely warned. “Few patients and their families are counseled about the risk,” admits UCSF pediatrician Dr. Malini Mahendra. The study projects 9,700 future cancers in children scanned in 2023 alone.
The U.S. healthcare system’s reliance on CT scans mirrors its broader dysfunction. Medicare’s new rules requiring hospitals to report radiation doses by 2027 are a belated response, but critics say real change requires rejecting medicine’s “mechanistic” approach.
What you can do
If your doctor is recommending a CT scan, it is important to make sure it is necessary. While these tests are justified in some cases, there are a few points you should keep in mind.
JD’s manually curated links for God-fearing MAGA patriots
First, question every scan. Ask: “Is this absolutely necessary? Are there radiation-free alternatives like MRI or ultrasound?” In some cases, it may be possible to choose a diagnostic tool with a lower risk. Reject “defensive medicine.” Up to 90% of scans offer “little to no medical value,” according to studies. Ask your doctor if the benefits outweigh the risks.
Be particularly cautious when it comes to children. Demand lower-dose protocols or non-radiation options for young patients given their higher risk.
CT scans save lives when used judiciously, but their rampant overuse—driven by profit, fear of lawsuits, and outdated medical dogma—has created a silent epidemic. As Dr. Smith-Bindman warns, “These future cancers can be reduced by avoiding unnecessary scans.” Until the healthcare system prioritizes prevention over profit, patients must arm themselves with knowledge and push back when needed.
Follow CancerCauses.news for more related stories.
Sources for this article include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.