(Just The News)—Despite a state legislative ban, Texas public universities are still implementing so-called diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) policies, state lawmakers have found.
Several institutions renamed or relaunched new units under a different name to continue implementing DEI policies, lawmakers found. Others are requiring DEI credits in order to be eligible to receive undergraduate degrees, according to two reports.
As a result, state law makers have frozen increased funding requests for all public higher education institutions in the state.
State Sen. Brandon Creighton, R-Conroe, filed the state’s first DEI ban in higher public education institutions, SB 17, in the last legislative session. After passing the state legislature and being signed into law by Gov. Greg Abbott, the law became effective Jan. 1, 2024. It prohibits higher education institutions from spending state-appropriated funds on DEI policies. It also requires governing boards to certify institutions are in compliance with the law.
Last year, higher education institutions began eliminating DEI positions and changing hiring practices in order to comply with the law, The Center Square reported.
However, complaints from constituents continued to roll in claiming some higher education institutions in Texas weren’t complying with state law. In response, Creighton and state Sen. Paul Bettencourt, R-Houston, launched an investigation. Creighton chairs the Senate Education Committee and Bettencourt chairs the Senate Finance Higher Education Work Group.
They sent a letter to the boards of regents at Texas public universities stating that reports they received “were not found to be satisfactory.”
Texas Education Code “directs governing boards to ensure each member institution does not ‘establish or maintain’ a DEI office – this includes renaming, relaunching or reauthorizing a DEI unit under the guise of a different name. We have found this to be the case in numerous instances, particularly at our health-related institutions,” they said.
As a result, “due to these valid findings of noncompliance, requests for increases in state funds for all public institutions of higher education this legislative session are now frozen at levels from the previous biennium,” they said.
They also instructed the regents to provide “clear and indisputable evidence that DEI programming has been fully eliminated” in their institutions in compliance with the law.
Failure to do so will result in loss of funding, they said.
They sent the letter after two major reports were issued highlighting DEI programs in higher education institutions nationwide, including in Texas.
One report published by Speech First, a free speech advocacy group, found that 67% of U.S. colleges and universities “require students to take a DEI-related class to graduate.”
Among them are 10 in Texas: Baylor University, Rice University, Southern Methodist University, Texas Tech University, the University of Texas’ Austin, El Paso and San Antonio campuses, Trinity University in San Antonio, University of Houston and the University of North Texas.
The Goldwater Institute published a report analyzing $1 billion worth of federal grants that had been allocated to promote DEI programs in K-12 schools and universities nationwide under the Biden administration. The report sought to quantify “the financial implications of these DEI mandates on students and state taxpayers.”
It identified public universities from at least 30 states that require all undergraduate students to complete a DEI course “to even be allowed to graduate with a degree from a state taxpayer-funded institution.”
In Texas, they include Texas Tech University, the University of Texas-Austin and El Paso campuses, and University of Houston-downtown. The report breaks down the cost to taxpayers in the thousands of dollars per student to comply with the DEI credit requirements, including in Texas.
In addition to raising concerns about higher education institutions, Creighton filed another bill this legislative session to ban DEI policies in K-12 public schools, The Center Square reported.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.