(Daily Signal)—A long train of policy failures allowed Mohamed Sabry Soliman, the suspect in Sunday’s terrorist attack on pro-Israel marchers in Boulder, to remain in the U.S., and in Colorado specifically, critics say.
The Centennial State has enacted a broad swath of “sanctuary” policies in recent years, preventing state and local law enforcement from alerting Immigration and Customs Enforcement about illegal aliens’ immigration status and allowing illegal aliens to obtain driver’s licenses and state benefits.
Critics say this lax enforcement created an atmosphere that enabled Soliman to overstay his work permit.
“Less than a month ago, Colorado Democrats stood and applauded the expansion of our state’s radical sanctuary laws—laws that fine law enforcement up to $50,000 for cooperating with ICE,” state Rep. Jarvis Caldwell, R-Colo., told The Daily Signal in a statement Tuesday.
“Now, one of the very individuals they’re protecting has brutally attacked Jewish Coloradans in Boulder,” Caldwell added. “These policies do not keep our communities safe. They enable violence, strain our resources, and make Colorado a sanctuary for chaos—not law and order.”
Soliman faces a federal hate crime charge and 16 state counts of attempted first-degree murder after he allegedly used a “makeshift flamethrower” and Molotov cocktails to attack citizens who were marching in honor of the hostages Hamas militants kidnapped from Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. He reportedly shouted, “Free Palestine!” amid the attack. The attack injured 12 people, many of whom are still recovering in the hospital.
A spokesperson for the Colorado House Democrats expressed outrage at the notion of questioning immigration policies in the wake of the attack.
“As a Jew, I find it both sickening and appalling that anyone would use an attack on our community to try to score political points, especially while the wounded are still in the hospital,” Jarrett Freedman told The Daily Signal.
When asked about “sanctuary” bills like SB 21-131, which restricts state employees from disclosing immigration information to ICE unless a court orders it, he noted that some Republicans voted for the measure.
“Before people are tempted to make that particular law a partisan issue, national outlets should be aware that the bill had bipartisan support,” he said. While six Republican senators and one Republican representative voted for the legislation, Democrats still led the charge for it, and it represents only one in a slew of “sanctuary” measures.
Centennial State House Republicans have filed legislation to enable ICE to work with local law enforcement, and Democrats have killed these bills in committee.
The Biden Administration’s Role
The White House blamed former President Joe Biden’s administration for allowing Soliman to enter the country.
“The Biden Admin granted the alien a visa and then, when he illegally overstayed, they gave him a work permit,” Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff, posted on X.
“The suspect, Mohamed Soliman, is illegally in our country,” Tricia McLaughlin, assistant secretary at the Department of Homeland Security, told The Daily Signal in a statement Tuesday. “He entered the country in August 2022 on a B2 visa that expired in February 2023. He filed for asylum in September 2022.”
“He was granted a work authorization in March 2023—that expired,” McLaughlin added.
Is Colorado a ‘Sanctuary State?’
Yet the tragic attack may also highlight Colorado’s laws on immigration.
“Both Colorado and Biden administration policies allowed this attack to take place,” Lora Ries, director of The Heritage Foundation’s Border Security and Immigration Center, told The Daily Signal in a statement Tuesday. “The sanctuary state of Colorado facilitated illegal residence with multiple benefits and Biden’s DHS permitted Soliman to overstay his expired federal immigration benefits.”
While the Department of Homeland Security had listed Colorado as a sanctuary state, Gov. Jared Polis, D-Colo., contested the claim. “Colorado is not a sanctuary state, despite this completely incorrect designation from DHS,” Polis told a Colorado Springs Fox News affiliate.
Yet in 2019, lawmakers passed and Polis signed HB 19-1124, which prevents Colorado law enforcement from arresting or detaining an individual based on an ICE notice of illegal status. The bill also prohibits probation officers from providing a person’s immigration status to federal authorities.
In 2020, Polis signed SB 20-083, which prohibits civil courthouse arrests, a practice ICE uses to enforce immigration law. In 2021, he signed SB 21-131 and SB 21-1194, which earmarked $100,000 to pay for legal representation for immigrants.
Polis also signed SB 21-199, which repeals requirements that residents prove their lawful presence in the U.S. to receive public benefits.
Last year, the governor signed HB 24-1280, which created a “welcome, reception, & integration grant program.” The law earmarked $2.5 million in grants “to community-based organizations that provide culturally and linguistically appropriate navigation of services and programs to migrants who are within one year of arrival in the United States.”
Last month, he signed SB 25-276, which bars state jails from holding illegal aliens so ICE can enforce immigration law. The new law also makes it easier for aliens to receive public benefits such as in-state college tuition and a driver’s license.
Polis’ office did not respond to The Daily Signal’s request for comment by publication time.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.