- The Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a U.K.-based organization, collaborated with U.S. taxpayer-funded groups to censor and demonetize conservative news outlets during the COVID-19 pandemic.
- The CCDH, led by CEO Imran Ahmed, received funding from various U.S. government agencies and private entities, allowing it to expand its operations into the United States.
- The CCDH’s “Disinformation Dozen” report labeled prominent Americans as primary sources of vaccine skepticism and was used by the Biden administration to justify censoring vaccine-critical content on social media platforms.
- The CCDH worked with Restless Development, a U.S. taxpayer-funded organization, to create “blocklists” of conservative websites, effectively blacklisting them from receiving advertising revenue.
- Free speech advocates and conservative leaders have expressed outrage over the CCDH’s activities, raising concerns about government overreach and the erosion of free speech in the United States.
(Natural News)—In a stunning revelation, newly uncovered documents show that the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a U.K.-based organization, collaborated with U.S. taxpayer-funded groups to censor and demonetize conservative news outlets during the COVID-19 pandemic. The campaign, which targeted prominent conservative platforms such as The Gateway Pundit, Zero Hedge and The Federalist, raises serious concerns about government overreach and the erosion of free speech in the United States.
The CCDH, led by CEO Imran Ahmed, has been accused of operating as a key player in a global censorship infrastructure, working alongside governments, NGOs and Big Tech companies to silence dissent. According to reports, the organization successfully pressured platforms like Google to demonetize conservative websites, effectively restricting their advertising revenue and limiting their reach.
A global censorship network funded by U.S. taxpayers
The CCDH’s efforts were not limited to the United Kingdom. The organization received funding from a variety of U.S. government agencies and private entities, including the Obama Foundation, USAID, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. This funding allowed the CCDH to expand its operations into the United States, where it targeted conservative voices under the guise of combating “misinformation.”
One of the CCDH’s most controversial campaigns was its “Disinformation Dozen” report, which labeled 12 prominent Americans—including Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Dr. Joseph Mercola and others—as the primary sources of vaccine skepticism online. The report, which was later found to contain exaggerated statistics and flawed methodology, was used by the Biden administration to justify censoring vaccine-critical content on social media platforms.
“The CCDH’s actions represent a dangerous precedent,” said a spokesperson for America First Legal, a conservative legal group that has filed a formal complaint with the Department of Justice. “This is not just about censorship; it’s about a foreign organization influencing U.S. policy and silencing American citizens.”
The role of restless development and Big Tech
The CCDH’s partnership with Restless Development, a U.S. taxpayer-funded organization, further underscores the extent of the censorship campaign. Restless Development, which received funding from USAID and other government agencies, worked with the CCDH to create “blocklists” of conservative websites, effectively blacklisting them from receiving advertising revenue.
Imran Ahmed, the CEO of CCDH, openly bragged about his organization’s success in demonetizing The Gateway Pundit during testimony before the U.K. Parliament in September 2021. “After a year of campaigning by CCDH, Google took them off their display network,” Ahmed said. “They are now demonetised, which means that they will not be able to spread their nonsense any further.”
The CCDH’s efforts were not limited to financial pressure. The organization also engaged in legal threats, targeting individuals and organizations that questioned the official COVID-19 narrative. In 2021, attorney Brian Rothschild, who is believed to be connected to the CCDH, announced plans to file a mass tort wrongful death lawsuit against members of the “Disinformation Dozen,” accusing them of spreading misinformation that led to COVID-19 deaths.
A threat to free speech and democracy
The revelations about the CCDH’s activities have sparked outrage among free speech advocates and conservative leaders. “This is a blatant attempt to silence dissent and control the narrative,” said a spokesperson for The Gateway Pundit. “When the government and Big Tech collude to censor voices they don’t agree with, it’s not just an attack on free speech—it’s an attack on democracy itself.”
The CCDH’s actions also raise questions about the role of foreign organizations in U.S. politics. America First Legal has called for a Department of Justice investigation into whether the CCDH and its leadership are “agents of a foreign principal” under the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA). “The Biden-Harris DOJ is now on notice,” said Gene Hamilton, Executive Director of America First Legal. “The time to investigate is now.”
As the debate over free speech and censorship continues to intensify, the revelations about the CCDH’s activities serve as a stark reminder of the dangers of government overreach and the importance of protecting the First Amendment. In an era where information is power, the fight for free speech is more critical than ever.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.