- Several prominent hospitals, including Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Henry Ford Health, Memorial Hermann Health System and Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, are accused of continuing to perform gender transition procedures on minors despite the Trump administration’s directive to halt such practices, risking the loss of federal funding.
- The report highlights the hospitals’ ongoing commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, with some maintaining robust infrastructures like “Diversity Coordinators” and “Diversity Councils.” This is seen as evidence of institutional defiance and a prioritization of ideological agendas over compliance with federal directives.
- The report argues that these hospitals are misusing tax breaks, federal funding and mandated discount programs to support projects unrelated to patient care, such as promoting left-wing activism and non-health-related books, rather than passing benefits on to patients and lowering costs.
- The report raises significant medical and ethical concerns, citing evidence that more than 80 percent of children with gender dysphoria outgrow it by late adolescence and that reassignment procedures often fail to resolve underlying issues, potentially exacerbating feelings of self-harm and suicide. Testimonies from detransitioners further highlight the alleged bias and negligence within the medical establishment.
- The report emphasizes the need for greater transparency and accountability within the medical community. It criticizes the adoption of an activist approach to gender transitions, suggesting that ideological beliefs may be influencing clinical decisions and compromising patient care, particularly for vulnerable populations like children.
(Natural News)—A new report suggests that several prominent hospitals may be defying the Trump administration’s directive to halt gender transition procedures on minors. This development raises critical questions about medical compliance, institutional accountability and the long-term implications for children undergoing these procedures.
The report, released in March by the conservative watchdog group Consumers’ Research, targets five major hospitals: Cleveland Clinic, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Henry Ford Health, Memorial Hermann Health System and Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital. It alleges that these hospitals are continuing to perform gender transition procedures on minors and promote left-wing activism, despite President Donald Trump’s clear directives to cease such practices or face the loss of federal funding.
The report paints a troubling picture of institutional defiance. Cleveland Clinic, for instance, is accused of maintaining a robust infrastructure for gender transitions, including “Diversity Coordinators,” “Diversity Councils” and an Office of Diversity & Inclusion that actively manages “diversity pipeline talent.” As of March, the Daily Caller reports that the Cleveland Clinic continues to perform gender transitions on minors.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center, another institution named in the report, has been under scrutiny since a 2022 exposé revealed the lucrative nature of its Clinic for Transgender Health. Despite apparent efforts to remove DEI-related content from its public-facing websites, Consumers’ Research remains skeptical, noting that some websites are still accessible via password-protected portals.
Henry Ford Health’s DEI agenda has drawn significant criticism, prompting an official complaint to be filed with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) in April. The report alleges that the health system continues to perform underage gender transitions, despite the regulatory changes. Similarly, Memorial Hermann Health System, which rebranded its Institute for the Advancement of Health Equity in February, is accused of perpetuating DEI initiatives under a different guise.
Johns Hopkins All Children’s Hospital, while claiming only to offer chemical rather than surgical gender transitions, is still implicated in the report. The hospital’s promotion of non-health-related books that advocate for the “systemic racism” view of America further fuels the perception that it prioritizes ideological agendas over patient care.
The report argues that these hospitals are misusing their tax breaks, federal funding and mandated discount programs to support projects unrelated to patient care. “Instead of passing benefits on to patients and lowering costs, hospitals use these programs to fund political priorities outside of their core mission,” the report states.
The medical and ethical debate
A significant body of evidence suggests that affirming gender confusion in children can have serious consequences. Studies indicate that more than 80 percent of children with gender dysphoria outgrow it by late adolescence. Moreover, “reassignment” procedures have been found to fail in resolving the underlying issues, often exacerbating feelings of self-harm and suicide. The report cites the testimonies of detransitioners who have experienced physical and mental harm as a result of these procedures, highlighting the medical establishment’s alleged bias and negligence. (Related: Trump administration reaffirms: Gender-related procedures are CHILD ABUSE.)
Many detransitioners have criticized the medical community for adopting an activist approach to gender transitions, arguing that doctors often approach cases with a predetermined conclusion in favor of transitioning. This critique suggests a systemic issue within the medical field, where ideological beliefs may be influencing clinical decisions.
The report underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability within the medical community. As hospitals continue to navigate the complex intersection of medicine, ethics and politics, they must prioritize the well-being of their patients above all else. The allegations raised in the report highlight the potential dangers of allowing ideological agendas to influence medical practice, particularly when it involves vulnerable populations like children.
Watch this video that talks about a judge who blocked Trump’s order to end treatment for transgender inmates.
More related stories:
- Trump threatens to cut federal funding to California over transgender athlete controversy.
- Trump administration orders renaming of USNS Harvey Milk.
- Trump’s fiscal year 2026 budget proposal slashes DEI, LGBTQ+ and abortion funding.
Sources include:
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.