(Discern Report)—The news of Charlie Kirk’s assassination hit like a thunderclap, leaving conservatives across the country reeling from the loss of a tireless voice for young people and American principles. But amid the grief, one Florida Democrat decided to pour salt in the wound with a Facebook post that twisted holy scripture into a sneer at Kirk’s devout beliefs.
Steve Cody, a councilman from Palmetto Bay, fired off his message on his personal page just as reports of the shooting surfaced. He paired a Kirk quote championing Second Amendment protections with his own venomous addition: “Charlie Kirk is a fitting sacrifice to our Lords: Smith and Wesson. Hallowed be their names.”
Those last words rip straight from the Lord’s Prayer, a cornerstone of Christian devotion that millions recite in moments of reverence. Cody’s version swaps out pleas to the Almighty for a mocking tribute to gun makers, framing Kirk’s brutal death—a single shot to the neck during a civil debate at Utah Valley University—as some twisted ritual payoff for political stances on self-defense. It’s the kind of rhetoric that doesn’t just attack a man’s ideas; it spits on the faith that guided him through years of building Turning Point USA and rallying the next generation against campus radicalism.
Kirk wasn’t hiding his convictions on that fateful Wednesday. He was in the thick of a tour to bridge divides on college grounds, urging students to question him openly and restore real dialogue in a fractured nation. The 31-year-old, who often wove his Christian worldview into talks on everything from border security to free speech, crediting divine intervention for saving President Trump last year in a widely shared video. Now, with the FBI dangling a $100,000 reward for tips on his killer, Cody’s post stands as a raw reminder of how quickly some turn tragedy into tribal score-settling.
The backlash was swift. Cody scrubbed the post after it drew fire, but screenshots had already spread like wildfire through Florida outlets. By Thursday evening, he surfaced with a public letter on his page, headlined simply: “I screwed up.”
In it, he tried to walk it back: “Yesterday, I regrettably made a significant error in judgment by sharing a quotation on my personal Facebook page that referenced remarks made by the deceased Charlie Kirk. This action, born out of my deep anger and frustration with the now too common tragedy of gun violence, was misguided. I want to state unequivocally that this post did not and does not reflect my personal values, my deeply held beliefs, or my solemn responsibilities as an elected official. To the Kirk family, my sincere condolences during this difficult time, and my apologies for any statements I made that caused you further distress.”
That admission of fault lands flat when you consider the deliberate sacrilege baked into the original words. Cody didn’t stumble into parodying a prayer; he crafted it to score points in the endless gun debate, using Kirk’s fresh blood as the ink. His profile picture—an AI-generated shot of Trump berating a taco—only adds to the sense of a man more at home in memes than meaningful public service. Apologies from folks like this often read like damage control, especially when the delete button comes before the delete key on their conscience.
Florida Republicans wasted no time piling on. U.S. Rep. Carlos Gimenez, the district’s congressman and a former Miami-Dade mayor who once battled fires as a first responder, didn’t mince words: “Absolutely mortified by Palmetto Bay councilman Steve Cody’s mocking of Charlie Kirk’s death in real time. This is unbecoming of any elected official. Steve Cody must resign.”
- Hand-curated links from conservative and Christian sites — NO legacy media garbage links. Patriots get their news every day at JDRucker.com
Gimenez’s call carries weight in a state where trust in leaders is hard-won; he’s seen enough real crises to know that elected voices should heal divides, not hack them wider with blasphemy.
Echoing that demand was Rep. María Elvira Salazar, another Miami-area heavyweight: “How disgusting for Steve Cody, an elected official, to not only celebrate news of Charlie Kirk’s assasination, but also, sacrilegiously smear the name of an American Patriot who was passionate about his faith in the one true lord, Jesus Christ. Charlie wanted his legacy to be courage for his faith. People like Cody betray the trust of the very community they represent.”
Salazar nails the deeper cut here—Kirk’s life was a testament to bold witness, from his post-Trump rally reflections on providence to his unapologetic stands on biblical truths amid cultural storms. To cheapen that with altar talk isn’t just tasteless; it’s a betrayal of the pluralism that lets faiths like his thrive in public squares.
The outrage spilled onto X, where Ryan Fournier, national chairman of Students for Trump, lit a fuse with a viral plea: “PLEASE HELP ME expose Florida Democrat and Palmetto Bay Council Member Steve Cody. This pathetic slob went on Facebook to celebrate Charlie Kirk’s death, sneering that the assassination was a ‘fitting sacrifice.’ SHARE FAR AND WIDE.”
Fournier’s post racked up thousands of shares, turning Cody into a lightning rod for conservatives still processing Kirk’s absence. Others joined the chorus, like the Mostly Peaceful Latinas podcast account updating followers: “Update 🚨 Miami democrat and council member Steve Cody refuses to resign and has apologized for his misguided post. We all know you’re only sorry you got caught. We demand you RESIGN or the governor has to step in and REMOVE you.”
Calls even reached Gov. Ron DeSantis directly, with users tagging him to boot Cody from office.
As the suspect hunt drags on, this episode exposes the rot in some corners of politics: a rush to gloat over graves, all while cloaking it in policy gripes. Kirk deserved better—from the shooter, from the system, and especially from those sworn to serve with decency. Whether Cody steps down or clings to his seat, his words will linger as a stain on Florida’s body politic, a crude echo in the prayers now rising for a fallen fighter.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.