- Scientists at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) have created an experimental Epigraph vaccine using computational modeling, designed to target multiple influenza strains (including H1N1 swine flu, bird flu and seasonal flu) with potential cross-species protection in pigs, birds and humans.
- In swine trials, the vaccine provided immunity against 12 flu strains, outperforming existing vaccines. Researchers hope it could lead to a long-lasting universal flu vaccine, preventing viral evolution in pigs – a key “mixing vessel” for zoonotic transmission.
- Unlike traditional vaccines that target mutable surface proteins, Epigraph analyzes over 6,000 historic flu strains to identify stable immune-triggering markers (epitopes), aiming for broader and more durable protection.
- Critics warn of potential drawbacks, including ineffectiveness against future mutations, immune suppression, and safety concerns. They point to past vaccine failures like the 1976 swine flu campaign, which was halted due to rare side effects.
- With influenza A causing significant annual deaths and pigs flagged as a potential source of dangerous bird flu mutations, the NIH- and USDA-funded research seeks to preempt outbreaks. However, debates persist over balancing innovation with safety, amid parallels to COVID-19 vaccine rollouts.
(Natural News)—Scientists at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln (UNL) have developed a single vaccine that targets multiple strains of influenza – including swine flu, bird flu and seasonal flu – fueling concerns that the next plandemic is on the horizon.
The experimental vaccine, designed using advanced computational modeling, has shown promise in protecting pigs against diverse influenza A viruses. The researchers have also expressed optimism that the injection will protect birds and humans from these pathogens. But skeptics warn that such vaccines may carry unforeseen dangers, including immune suppression and failure against mutated strains.
In a study published late last month in Nature Communications, the UNL researchers detailed how the Epigraph vaccine – named after the software used to design it – outperformed existing commercial vaccines in swine trials. Pigs vaccinated with Epigraph developed robust immunity against 12 different flu strains – including the H1N1 virus responsible for the 2009 swine flu pandemic. The H1N1 strain infected a quarter of the global population and killed over half a million people.
Dr. Eric Weaver, the study’s lead author, called the findings a critical step toward a universal flu vaccine that could last a decade or longer. “If we can prevent influenza in swine, we can cut off the virus’s evolutionary advantage,” he added. According to Weaver, also the director of the Nebraska Center for Virology at UNL, pigs often act as a “mixing vessel” for dangerous zoonotic jumps between birds and humans.
Is the Epigraph flu injection a Trojan horse for the next plandemic?
The Epigraph vaccine was developed after researchers analyzed over 6,000 influenza strains from the past century to identify common viral markers (epitopes) that trigger immune responses. Unlike traditional vaccines, which target rapidly mutating surface proteins, targeting these epitopes could lead to broader, longer-lasting protection.
Weaver’s team is now testing a dual H1/H3 variant vaccine, with hopes of eventual human trials. However, no timeline has been set for public availability.
Despite the optimism, critics argue that such vaccines may be ineffective against future mutations or even weaken natural immunity. Others, meanwhile, argue that such vaccines and their rollout under government-backed vaccination programs prioritize profit over safety.
Historical context supports caution. Past flu vaccines have sometimes offered limited protection, and the 1976 swine flu debacle saw mass vaccinations halted after rare neurological side effects emerged. (Related: The flu vaccine paradox: Are we making things worse?)
The stakes are high; influenza A infects up to 15 percent of humans annually, with H1 and H3 subtypes causing thousands of deaths. The European Union recently flagged pigs as a potential catalyst for a deadly bird flu mutation transmissible to humans. Weaver’s research, funded by the National Institutes of Health and the U.S. Department of Agriculture, aims to preempt such crises.
“We’re on the precipice of a third wave of vaccines – lifelong and universal,” he said. But as with all medical breakthroughs, the balance between innovation and risk remains delicate. Vaccines like Epigraph may cause more harm than good, as they undermine the body’s natural immunity.
One cannot help but notice, however, that the news of Epigraph’s supposed “promise” comes amid reports of the flu virus “jumping from animals to humans.” This same pattern was observed during the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. But sooner or later, people may see Epigraph become ubiquitous amid this new “plandemic” in the same manner as the mRNA vaccines.
FluShot.news has more similar stories. Watch Jefferey Jaxen and Del Bigtree talking about a study that shows getting the flu vaccine increases one’s chances of catching influenza.
This video is from The HighWire with Del Bigtree channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- FDA halts annual flu strain selection meeting, signaling an end to seasonal flu vaccine FRAUD.
- DEADLY FLU JAB WARNING: New flu vaccines make recipients 27 PERCENT MORE LIKELY to catch the flu.
- VACCINE CULTISTS DEMAND COMPLIANCE: After 1 human case of Bird Flu, vax extremist Dr. Leana Wen calls for FDA to authorize mRNA jab immediately.
Sources include:
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.