The news of James Comey’s indictment this week hit like a thunderclap, charging the former FBI director with making false statements and obstruction of justice tied to the Trump-Russia investigation. It’s a long-overdue step toward holding accountable those who pushed the Russiagate narrative, and now all eyes are turning to John Brennan, the ex-CIA chief who’s been a vocal defender of Comey—and potentially facing his own legal troubles.
Brennan didn’t waste time jumping to Comey’s defense. In a recent MSNBC appearance, he insisted that his old colleague is “a man of integrity, of honesty” and “committed to the rule of law.”
You’re next. And if you’re scared say you’re scared. @AGPamBondi @FBIDirectorKash pic.twitter.com/S8aHluiqCj
— General Mike Flynn (@GenFlynn) September 27, 2025
But that endorsement might say more about Brennan’s own vulnerabilities than Comey’s innocence. After all, these two were key players in the intelligence community’s assessment that painted Russia as meddling in the 2016 election to help Trump, a claim that’s unraveled under scrutiny.
Back in July, reports emerged that Brennan and Comey were both under criminal investigation by the DOJ for potential wrongdoing in the Trump-Russia probe. Sources pointed to false statements made to Congress and other missteps.
Legal experts like Jonathan Turley have called Brennan “like a 30 point buck now, out in the open,” arguing he’s the most exposed to charges over lies about the Steele dossier’s inclusion in the 2017 Intelligence Community Assessment.
The timing adds urgency. The statute of limitations for some of Brennan’s alleged actions, like his August 2020 questioning by Special Counsel John Durham, could run out as early as next week. One analysis notes there’s just days left—potentially by Tuesday, September 30—to bring charges tied to that session, where Brennan might have spun tales to cover his tracks. If prosecutors act fast, this could open the floodgates, attributing later overt acts to the broader conspiracy and keeping the window open for others involved.
Not everyone’s optimistic, though. Recent setbacks have stalled the probe, including a purge by DNI Tulsi Gabbard that some say undermined the investigation into Brennan. Officials claim her actions created roadblocks, delaying what looked like a sure path to indictment in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania. Trump himself has ramped up talk of retribution, hinting at charges against Brennan alongside figures like Comey and even George Soros. In a summer interview, he accused Brennan of trying to sabotage his first term.
On X, the chatter is electric. General Michael Flynn didn’t mince words, tweeting a clip of Brennan and declaring, “you’re next.”
Others speculate that Brennan’s rush to defend Comey stems from fear that his co-conspirator might flip. One user pointed out the irony: “John Brennan is a sh** stain on the legacy of CIA. His endorsement is a f***ing indictment of guilt.”
Whistleblower accounts paint Brennan as a Machiavellian operator who rose through the ranks by alliances and revenge, eventually landing in Obama’s inner circle despite widespread dislike in the agency.
Bill O’Reilly predicted back in July that Brennan could face charges for those fraudulent reports, saying, “If that’s true… he’s going to be charged.”
Bill O’Reilly predicts John Brennan, ex-CIA Director, might be indicted for publishing three “unclear, uncertain, potentially biased, or implausible” intelligence reports, as per a House Select Committee finding.
— 𝐃𝐔𝐓𝐂𝐇 (@pr0ud_americans) July 24, 2025
And with newly declassified documents exposing the Russiagate hoax—like Susan Rice’s email about Obama and Comey hiding details from Trump’s team—the ropes are tightening. This isn’t just about one man; it’s about dismantling the Deep State machinery that targeted a duly elected president.
Will Brennan skate by, or is this the moment justice catches up? With Comey’s case as precedent and the clock ticking, the potential for indictment feels more real than ever. If it happens, it could metastasize into something bigger, reaching higher up the chain. Stay tuned—this story’s far from over.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.