- Assembly Bill A7788, introduced by Assemblyman Clyde Vanel, would allow New York state agencies to accept Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash for taxes, fines, rent and civil penalties, mirroring similar efforts in states like Colorado and Louisiana.
- The bill authorizes a state-mandated service fee for crypto transactions, drawing criticism from advocates who fear it could disadvantage low-income users and undermine cryptocurrency’s low-fee advantages, while defenders emphasize transparency.
- It complements anti-crypto-fraud measures like Bill A06515, which criminalizes “rug pull” scams, reflecting dual legislative priorities of enabling adoption while addressing risks from malicious practices.
- It also echoes New York’s abandonment of its restrictive BitLicense (2015–2021) and expands into non-payment applications, such as Vanel’s blockchain-based voter record security proposal (A7716), signaling evolving regulatory openness.
- The bill pressures U.S. federal authorities to finalize crypto policies amid global competition (e.g. El Salvador), while IRS tax ambiguity and debates over balancing innovation with governance remain critical unresolved challenges.
(Natural News)—Assembly Bill A7788, introduced by Assemblyman Clyde Vanel (D-Queens), seeks to modernize New York’s public payment systems by allowing state agencies to accept Bitcoin, Ether, Litecoin and Bitcoin Cash.
If passed, the bill would permit crypto payments for obligations ranging from taxes and fines to rent and civil penalties. This legislation, referred to the Assembly’s Governmental Operations Committee, follows similar efforts in states like Colorado and Louisiana, signaling a national trend toward digital asset adoption.
A contentious clause in the bill empowers the state to impose a service fee on crypto transactions, covering costs like cryptocurrency issuer fees or blockchain transaction charges. While proponents argue this ensures transparency, critics question how these fees might disadvantage lower-income users or dilute cryptocurrency’s efficiency as a low-fee system.
“The provision must balance accessibility with operational needs,” said one financial analyst, though no direct quotes from stakeholders were provided in legislative materials.
This proposal emerges amid heightened political focus on crypto regulation. Earlier this month, Bill A06515 was introduced to criminalize crypto fraud and “rug pulls,” scams where developers abandon projects after inflating coin prices. Vanel’s push for blockchain voter record security via bill A7716 further underscores the growing bipartisan curiosity about the technology’s applications.
Vanel has advocated crypto-friendly policies repeatedly, introducing analogous measures since 2017. His persistence mirrors New York’s cyclical regulatory experiments with digital currencies. In 2015, the state’s now-defunct BitLicense, enforced under former New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS) head Ben Lawsky, drew criticism for stifling innovation by mandating excessive compliance, including employee background checks. The BitLicense model’s eventual retreat in 2021 hints at evolving regulatory approaches, shifting from restrictive measures to accommodation.
New York’s legislative moves align with a national trend. Colorado became the first state to accept crypto for tax payments in 2022, while Louisiana followed suit last autumn. Proposals in California and Florida highlight rising bipartisan interest, though critics argue that token variations like meme coins complicate trust. Illinois recently passed anti-rug-pull legislation, emphasizing fraud prevention as a parallel priority to adoption.
Tech developers and decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms have publicly supported crypto modernization, viewing New York’s bill as progress. Supporters argue that blockchain’s transparency could reduce administrative errors in taxes and public records. Meanwhile, corporate entities like payment processors may lobby to become authorized ‘bridges’ between crypto and state systems if fees are structured as middleman roles.
Bill A7788’s path forward
As the bill awaits committee review, analysts speculate about its survival in Albany’s Democratic-controlled legislature. Vanel’s track record suggests bipartisan resonance, given overlaps with GOP-advocated “right to payment choice.” Should it pass, New York would join a vanguard of states reimagining fiscal infrastructure, a move that advocates hope could pressure Washington to follow.
Vanel’s parallel blockchain vote-protection bill (A7716) highlights crypto’s extensions beyond payments. The proposal mandates a state study on blockchain’s role in securing election systems, a topic that has been increasingly debated post-2020. While critics question whether private blockchains can achieve intended transparency, proponents argue that immutable records guard against fraud.
Recent collapses, like the $40 billion FTX platform failure, underscore why lawmakers prioritize fraud prevention alongside innovation.
“Without clear rules, crypto risks becoming a Wild West again,” stated a state policy expert, referencing A06515’s anti-rug-pull mandate. Such bills aim to protect investors while insulating state coffers from high-risk speculative tokens.
Globally, nations like El Salvador and Nigeria have adopted crypto-friendly policies to bypass dollar-dominated finance. New York’s bill may pressure U.S. regulators to advance federal frameworks as rival countries attract blockchain entrepreneurs. However, U.S. agencies like the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have lagged in finalizing tax treatment of crypto, complicating local efforts to collect revenue.
New York’s crypto payment bill represents a pivotal moment in the technology’s legislative journey. While supporters praise it as a forward-thinking infrastructure policy, skeptics caution against overreach. The outcome will shape debates nationally, testing whether digital currencies can evolve from speculative tools to mainstream fiscal instruments. As Vanel’s proposal advances, stakeholders await clarity on fees, security and the balance between innovation and governance. (Related: The great crypto power struggle: How technocrats and governments are reshaping global finance.)
Head over to CryptoCult.news for more related stories. Watch the video below that talks about cash-like crypto instruments and retail use cases.
This video is from the Brighteon Highlights channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- Trump’s BITCOIN GAMBIT: U.S. launches Strategic Bitcoin Reserve to cement crypto dominance.
- U.S. regulator greenlights banks for crypto activities, reversing 2021 restrictions.
- Trump’s Strategic Bitcoin Reserve: A bold move or a missed opportunity for crypto growth?
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.