(DCNF)—Gun control activist David Hogg’s efforts to help revamp the Democratic Party have been off to a rocky start thus far and some fellow Democrats are noticing, the Washington Post reported on Friday.
Leaders We Deserve — a political organization co-founded by Hogg — announced in June that it was backing Irene Shin in the special election to replace late Democratic Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly, and also privately vowed to shell out $400,000 to help get Shin elected, the Washington Post reported. Despite this, Leaders We Deserve backed out of its financial commitment just days later, multiple anonymous Democrats told the outlet.
One anonymous Democrat told the Washington Post that the situation was “shocking.” Leaders We Deserve notably did not explain its reasoning for reversing course on its financial commitment, the anonymous sources told the outlet. Shin went on to lose the June 28 Democratic Primary for the special election to James Walkinshaw, Connolly’s former chief of staff, by a landslide margin of 45 percentage points.
Hogg was notably ousted from his position as a vice chair for the Democratic National Committee (DNC) in June. His ouster came after he drew intense criticism from fellow Democrats for unveiling a plan in April for Leaders We Deserve to spend $20 million to primary “out-of-touch, ineffective” older House Democrats in 2026.
“He [Hogg], clearly, not the mission, is front and center. And much of this money seems to be going toward self-promotion,” New York state Sen. James Skoufis, who ran for DNC chair in early 2025, told the Washington Post. “It’s not what we need right now as a Democratic Party.”
Yet, Kenneth Pennington, the digital director for Independent Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders’ 2016 presidential campaign and a partner at Middle Seat, one of Leaders We Deserve’s top consultants, told the Washington Post that the group’s efforts to elect younger leaders are “very smart.”
“What Leaders We Deserve is doing is not only not unusual, it’s very smart,” Pennington told the outlet. “And because David’s message is catching on, they are seeing massive grassroots funding success.”
Leaders We Deserve describes itself as an organization “dedicated to electing young progressives to Congress and State Legislatures across the country to help defeat the far-right agenda.” Just four of the candidates that Leaders We Deserve listed on its website as 2024 endorsements actually won their campaigns, according to the Washington Post.
Leaders We Deserve’s 2026 endorsements featured on its website include far-left Democratic New York City mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani, as well as Deja Foxx, who lost to Adelita Grijalva in the July Democratic primary for the special election to replace Grijalva’s father, late Democratic Arizona Rep. Raúl Grijalva. Shin is also listed under the organization’s 2026 endorsements, along with Democratic Illinois State Sen. Robert Peters, who is running in a crowded primary for an open Chicago-area House seat in 2026.
Still, Hogg insisted that his group’s objective is “not to simply throw money at candidates and hope they win.”
“On top of that, we’re making major investments into our grassroots donor network and capacity ahead of the election year,” Hogg told the Washington Post.
The 25-year-old also told the outlet that Leaders We Deserve is working with dozens of 2026 Democratic candidates “launching their campaigns very soon.”
The report comes as many Democrats have been expressing the need for new, younger party leaders. A Reuters/Ipsos poll released June 19 found that 62% of Democrats said they agreed with a statement that “the leadership of the Democratic Party should be replaced with new people.”
Moreover, DNC Chair Ken Martin, who had clashed with Hogg during the activist’s tumultuous four-month tenure as one of Martin’s vice chairs, told Fox News in late July that while the Democratic Party has “hit rock bottom,” there is “only one direction to go, and that’s up.”
Leaders We Deserve did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.
All content created by the Daily Caller News Foundation, an independent and nonpartisan newswire service, is available without charge to any legitimate news publisher that can provide a large audience. All republished articles must include our logo, our reporter’s byline and their DCNF affiliation. For any questions about our guidelines or partnering with us, please contact [email protected].
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.