• About
  • Politics
  • Conspiracy
  • Culture
  • Financial
  • Geopolitics
  • Faith
  • Survival
No Result
View All Result
Thursday, June 12, 2025
DiscernTV
  • Home
    • About
  • Browse
    • Conspiracy
    • Culture
    • Events
    • Faith
    • Financial
    • Geopolitics
    • Politics
    • Survival
  • Home
    • About
  • Browse
    • Conspiracy
    • Culture
    • Events
    • Faith
    • Financial
    • Geopolitics
    • Politics
    • Survival
No Result
View All Result
DiscernTV
No Result
View All Result
Home News
FDA

“Reprehensible” FDA Sued for Withholding Covid-19 Vaxx Safety Analyses: “The Courts Will Command the FDA to Do Its Job”

by Zachary Stieber, The Epoch Times
January 28, 2023

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has been sued for withholding the results of key COVID-19 vaccine safety analyses.

The FDA’s actions violate federal law, the new lawsuit, filed on Jan. 26 in federal court in Washington by the nonprofit Children’s Health Defense (CHD), alleges.


  • Not All “Survival Food” Supplies Are Created Equal


The suit is seeking the raw results from the FDA’s analyses of reports to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS).

The system, which the FDA runs with the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, accepts reports of post-vaccination adverse events.

As part of its vaccine safety monitoring, the FDA pledged to run a type of analyses called Empirical Bayesian (EB) data mining on the reports to see if any safety signals were triggered. Signals give agencies an idea of which problems may be caused by vaccines. Agencies are supposed to research signals to verify them or rule them unrelated to vaccination.

“A report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event. But VAERS can give CDC and FDA important information. If it looks as though a vaccine might be causing a problem, FDA and CDC will investigate further and take action if needed,” the CDC says on its website.

The FDA denied CHD’s request for the results of the data mining, claiming the records are “intra-agency memoranda consisting of opinions, recommendations, and policy discussions within the deliberative process of FDA, from which factual information is not reasonably segregable.”

The FDA also claimed the sought-after information “contains a discussion of legal and policy matters and fall within the attorney work product and attorney-client privileges as enunciated by the Supreme Court.”

The FDA also refused to provide the results of the EB data mining to The Epoch Times, using the same rationale.

In a set of operating procedures, the federal government said the FDA would carry out Empirical Bayesian data mining and the CDC would conduct a separate type of analyses using a method called Proportional Rate Ratio, or another way to analyze the VAERS data.

China controls 90% of all pharmaceutical ingredients used in the US. Don’t wait for the supply chain to break or for pharmacies to run out. Stock up on long-term storage antibiotics and prescription meds with Jase.

 

 

After lying about when it started the proportional data mining and stonewalling inquiries, the CDC recently released the results of the analyses to The Epoch Times, revealing the agency identified hundreds of adverse events potentially connected to the Pfizer and Moderna COVID-19 vaccines.

Kim Witczak, co-founder of Woodymatters, a nonprofit that advocates for a stronger FDA and drug safety system, said at the time that the agency’s refusal to provide the analyses was not acceptable.

“The secrecy is unacceptable for an agency that said it is transparent with the public about vaccine safety,” Witczak said.

Lawmakers, including Rep. Ronny Jackson (R-Texas), have also questioned (pdf) why the records were not released.

The FDA and CDC only publicly acknowledge a small number of adverse events as being definitely caused by or potentially caused by the messenger RNA shots, including myocarditis, or heart inflammation.

The CDC claimed that the results of its analyses “were generally consistent with EB data mining.”

CHD says the refusal by the FDA to release the EB mining results violates the Freedom of Information Act, which enables people and organizations to request information from federal agencies.

While exemptions exist, the FDA improperly withheld the requested data, the new lawsuit charges. It notes that the FDA did not provide any evidence to support its claims that it could not release the records.

In these uncertain financial times, you need a company you can trust with stewardship of your life’s savings. We recommend self-directed IRAs backed by physical precious metals provided by Augusta with ZERO Gold IRA fees for up to 10 years.

While the CHD appealed to the government for a fresh look at the request, the FDA said it would not have a response to the appeal until “around” the summer of 2023.

The Freedom of Information Act requires an agency to make requested records “promptly available” to a requester and imposes other time restrictions, which have not been adhered to, the suit says.

CHD is asking the court to find the FDA’s failures to meet the time requirements unlawful and order the FDA to produce all non-exempt records within 20 days. CHD is also asking the court to award attorneys’ fees and other litigation costs. The FDA did not respond to a request for comment.

“It is long overdue for the FDA to release the data on the Empirical Bayesian data mining that it promised even before the COVID shot rollout” Mary Holland, president and general counsel of CHD, said in a statement. “It is reprehensible for this agency, established to protect the American people, to conceal critical data. I trust that the courts will command the FDA to do its job.”

Article cross-posted from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times. Image by Felton Davis via Flickr, CC BY 2.0.

Donation

Buy author a coffee

Donate
Promised Grounds Proverbs 24 Blend





At Last, a Company With Integrity in the Gold IRA Industry

For several years, I’ve been vetting out precious metals companies in search of the best. I believe in gold and silver but it’s hard to find integrity in the Gold IRA industry. The vast majority operate with shady tactics and gigantic spreads that take advantage of Americans who simply want to protect their life’s savings.

I’ve found a handful that I like and I’ve worked with some of them. By no means would I “unrecommend” them because, again, I vetted them out and found them to be above the fold. Unfortunately, it isn’t hard to be better than the rest when the rest are so darn awful.

After years of searching, I finally found a company that truly operates with integrity. Augusta Precious Metals has three important attributes that set them far above the competition:

  • Non-Commissioned Sales Team: I cannot stress how important and unique this is. With just about every other company in the Gold IRA industry, the sales teams make commission from every account they open. This means they steer their clients toward the gold and silver products with the highest commission. With Augusta Precious Metals, the team is solely focused on putting the best gold and silver for their clients into their IRA. They get paid to serve the best interests of the Gold IRA client, NOT their own commission pay.
  • Incredibly Low Fees: Most Americans would be shocked if they knew the spread other Gold IRA companies charge. Augusta charges just 5% versus up to 45% elsewhere.
  • No Pressure, No Gimmicks: There’s an understanding among most in the Gold IRA industry that fear and pressure is the way to go. Augusta Precious Metals takes a sober approach when working with clients because they hold integrity in the highest possible regard. This is why they don’t offer gimmicks like “free” or “bonus” silver. It’s also why they do not apply pressure tactics to get quick sales. Their educational and transparent approach to doing business is exceedingly rare in the Gold IRA industry.

Reach out to Augusta Precious Metals to learn more about protecting your wealth and retirement with physical precious metals.

Comments 5

  1. Jack says:
    2 years ago

    The Courts Will Command the FDA to Do Its Job?????
    That would be a good idea.

    Reply
    • GJ says:
      2 years ago

      But not right away. The courts usually get it right, but not in the time it matters to the litigants.

      Reply
  2. Not Chicken Little says:
    2 years ago

    Not much you can do to force the FDA to do their job – they are a law unto themselves and will do what they dam well please.

    Fire about half of them or more is the real remedy. And if that doesn’t work, fire another half. Rinse and repeat until they can do no harm.

    Reply
  3. nightdipper says:
    2 years ago

    Courts in a banana republic don’t consider the law or constitution in making their rulings. There is no arguing that the USA is 100% banana republic (since 2008.)

    Reply
  4. J Stone says:
    2 years ago

    The FDA and CDC both violated the law by changing the definition of “vaccine” as stated in USC 26 §4132 (a)(2). THEY DO NOT HAVE THE AUTHORITY TO CHANGE THE DEFINITION ONLY THE LEGISLATURE DOES. USC 26 states that a vaccine is defined as a “substance that prevents one or more diseases”.

    NONE of the paperwork for ANY OF THE Candidate shots meets that level in their description. They only say “may reduce the symptoms”. FDA and CDC are guilty of FRAUD and “Crimes against Humanity” and should be held accountable.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

  • About
  • Politics
  • Conspiracy
  • Culture
  • Financial
  • Geopolitics
  • Faith
  • Survival
© 2024 Conservative Playlist.

Welcome Back!

Login to your account below

Forgotten Password?

Retrieve your password

Please enter your username or email address to reset your password.

Log In
No Result
View All Result
  • Home
    • About
  • Browse
    • Conspiracy
    • Culture
    • Events
    • Faith
    • Financial
    • Geopolitics
    • Politics
    • Survival

© 2024 Conservative Playlist.