Silicon Valley Bank’s shares have tanked, causing panic in the financial sector to spread from Wall Street to Europe and Asia. This comes after the lender announced it would sell shares at a loss in order to cover rapidly declining customer deposits.
Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) Financial Group, a bank which lends primarily to tech companies, told investors on Mar. 9 that it was forced to sell almost $2 billions in shares to raise additional capital to help offset bond sale losses.
The news quickly triggered massive losses across the banking sector and raised concerns that the Federal Reserve’s interest-rate hikes were preventing banks from raising capital.
Before last year, when interest rates were near zero, large banks were buying up U.S. Treasurys and bonds, but the rise in the federal fund rate has since weakened their value, while banks sit on increasing losses.
Since banks tend to hold large portfolios of bonds, their decline is normally not a problem unless they are forced to sell them.
U.S. government bonds surged after the California lender sold off shares to cover bond losses, leading to more worries over the banking sector’s debt holdings.
Bank Stock Values Plunge Across the Board
The news from the tech industry lender quickly caused a knock-on effect on Thursday, as banking stocks fell at their fastest pace since the first months of the pandemic, taking Wall Street’s major indexes down with them.
SVB shares tumbled more than 60 percent and lost another 20 percent in after-hours trading, in the worst decline in the sector, after CEO Greg Becker admitted the bank could be dealing with problems for the foreseeable future.
Meanwhile, America’s four largest banks lost more than $50 billion in market value at the end of trading on Mar. 9.
Shares of JPMorgan Chase fell 5.4 percent, while Bank of America took a 6.2 percent hit, Wells Fargo was down 6.2 percent, and Citigroup tumbled 4.1 percent.
Bank stocks in Europe and Asia sold off sharply the following day, as news surrounding SVB Financial spread to markets across the world.
The Euro Stoxx Banks Index witnessed its worst day since June 2022, led by Deutsche Bank, which saw an 8 percent loss, followed by Société Générale, HSBC, ING Groep, and Commerzbank, which all fell more than 5 percent.
“Lots of chatter today about the possibility of generalized U.S. banking system stress due to SVB troubles. Three summary things on this: While the U.S. banking system as a whole is solid, and it is, that does not mean that every bank is,” stated economist Mohamed A. El-Erian in a tweet.
“Due to the volatility in yields after the prior protracted period of leverage-enabling policy, the most vulnerable currently are those vulnerable to both interest rate and credit risk. Contagion risk and the systemic threat can be easily contained by careful balance sheet management and avoiding more policy mistakes,” he continued.
Meanwhile, U.S. and European bond yields fell to their lowest level in weeks, after investors bet that turmoil in the bank sector could reduce the ability of the Fed to keep hiking interest rates.
Silicon Valley Lender’s Bonds Lose Value to Rising Interest Rates
The interest-rate hikes over the past year have also caused value of its bonds to fall, particularly those that took many years to mature, forcing the bank to reinvest the proceeds from its sales into shorter-term assets.
SVB has suffered significant losses on its portfolio, which was heavily invested in U.S. Treasurys and mortgage-backed securities, which have all taken a beating.
The 40-year-old bank was forced into a fire sale of its securities on Thursday, dumping $21 billion worth of holdings at a $1.75 billion loss while raising $500 million from venture firm General Atlantic, according to a financial mid-quarter report on Mar. 8.
SVB additionally reported more than $90 billion in held-to-maturity securities.
Its recent losses have caused American startup firms, particularly venture-backed tech and life sciences companies, to feel the pinch, as the bank caters heavily to these new firms.
Higher interest rates, fears of a recession, and a tepid market for initial public offerings have made it harder for new startups to raise additional capital in the past year.
The lender’s 2022 third quarter report stated it was partnered with nearly half of all venture-backed tech and health care companies based in the United States.
“The failure of @SVB_Financial could destroy an important long-term driver of the economy as VC-backed companies rely on SVB for loans and holding their operating cash. If private capital can’t provide a solution, a highly dilutive gov’t preferred bailout should be considered,” warned Pershing Square CEO Bill Ackman in a tweet.
“After what the Feds did to @jpmorgan after it bailed out Bear Stearns, I don’t see another bank stepping in to help @SVB_Financial,” he added.
Investors were worried ahead of today’s employment report from the Department of Labor, which they hope will provide some hint on the Fed’s next policy moves.
SVB Reassures Investors That Things Are Fine
The collapse of SVB’s stock value comes shortly after a key lender for the cryptocurrency industry, Silvergate Capital, announced liquidation plans on Mar. 8, following the implosion of FTX, which used the bank to transfer customer funds.
However, the bank said in its letter to investors that it had minimal exposure to crypto, but analysts are still concerned that not all is well at SVB.
Becker reassured investors that their assets were safe and that the stock sale was only an attempt to increase financial flexibility, strength, and profitability at the bank, but the current market situation has caused pressure to its “balance of fund flows.”
The bank cited higher interest rates and “elevated cash burn from our clients” at a historically elevated level and less investments from venture capital, are the primary reasons for raising new capital.
Becker said the bank has “ample liquidity” to support its clients “with one exception: If everybody is telling each other that SVB is in trouble, that will be a challenge.”
He asked clients to “stay calm. That’s my ask. We’ve been there for 40 years, supporting you, supporting the portfolio companies, supporting venture capitalists.”
SVB’s mid-quarter update reported a low ratio of loans to deposits, at 43 percent, which leaves little protection in the wake of a share-price selloff over the coming days.
If startups panic and begin pulling funds from SVB due to concern about its financial health, this could exacerbate the mismatch in deposits and withdrawals, increasing pressure on the bank.
Still, one expert believes the problem goes deeper than just investors getting spooked by SVB and that it is more systemic.
“Why this sudden meltdown in bank stocks? Small banks face a double whammy: Less ”financial liquidity” (reserves) in the system, disproportionately affecting them, a tougher funding landscape, with plenty of safer and higher-yielding alternatives for depositors. This is the real issue, [in my honest opinion],” said Alfonso Peccatiello, founder and CEO of TheMacroCompass, in a tweet.
Article cross-posted from our premium news partners at The Epoch Times.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.