Attorneys with the Thomas More Society have turned to the U.S. Supreme Court with an urgent plea to intervene in a California case that pits state secrecy against family transparency. On Thursday, they filed an emergency application in the ongoing lawsuit Mirabelli v. Bonta, asking the justices to block policies that compel public schools to conceal children’s gender transitions from their parents. This move comes just days after the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stay on a lower court’s injunction, effectively allowing the state’s rules to snap back into place across California’s education system.
The policies in question, rooted in Assembly Bill 1955 signed into law by Governor Gavin Newsom in 2024, prohibit school staff from notifying parents if a student expresses a desire to change their gender identity, pronouns, or name at school. Schools must accommodate these changes without parental input, even if families hold strong religious or moral objections. Critics argue this setup not only erodes the foundational bond between parents and children but also forces educators into a web of deception, punishing those who choose honesty over compliance.
The lawsuit began in 2023 when two Christian teachers challenged the rules, claiming they violated their First Amendment rights by requiring them to participate in what they saw as misleading families. By 2024, several parents joined the fray, including a Catholic couple identified as John and Jane Poe. Their junior-high daughter had been treated as male by school staff for almost a year, complete with a new name and pronouns, all without their knowledge. They only discovered the situation after her suicide attempt, a heartbreaking revelation that underscored the potential dangers of such secrecy.
U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez delivered a decisive blow to the policies on December 22, 2025, issuing a permanent injunction that halted their enforcement statewide for the certified class of plaintiffs—those with religious or moral objections. He ruled that the state’s approach unconstitutionally interfered with parents’ rights to direct their children’s upbringing and compelled teachers to speak against their beliefs. However, California Attorney General Rob Bonta quickly appealed, and on January 5, 2026, a Ninth Circuit panel granted a stay, citing procedural concerns and mischaracterizing the injunction’s scope as overly broad.
In their Supreme Court filing, the attorneys contend that the Ninth Circuit’s decision ignored key precedents and distorted the record, allowing irreparable harm to continue. “Right now, California’s parental deception scheme is keeping families in the dark and causing irreparable harm,” said Paul M. Jonna, special counsel for the Thomas More Society. “The state is inserting itself unconstitutionally between parents and children, forcing schools to deceive families, and punishing teachers who tell the truth.” The team has also requested an en banc review from the full Ninth Circuit, signaling their determination to fight on multiple fronts.
This isn’t the first time California’s education mandates have sparked backlash. Similar policies have faced scrutiny in other states, with courts increasingly siding with parental rights. For instance, a federal judge in Kansas ruled in 2025 that schools cannot withhold gender-related information from parents, echoing arguments in Mirabelli. Meanwhile, advocates point to broader patterns, suggesting these rules form part of a concerted effort by progressive lawmakers to sideline traditional family structures, potentially exposing vulnerable children to influences without oversight.
From a faith perspective, the case resonates deeply with those who view parenting as a divine responsibility. Scriptures like Proverbs 22:6—”Train up a child in the way he should go”—remind believers of the duty to guide their offspring, a role the state seems eager to usurp. The Poes’ story, where their daughter’s crisis unfolded in shadows, serves as a stark warning: when government steps in as the primary authority, the fallout can be devastating and irreversible.
As the Supreme Court weighs this emergency request, families across California hang in the balance. If the justices act swiftly, they could restore a measure of sanity to schools, affirming that parents, not bureaucrats, hold the reins on their children’s well-being. Without intervention, the policies risk entrenching a system where secrecy trumps trust, leaving more parents blindsided and more children adrift in confusion. The outcome could set a national tone, either curbing state overreach or emboldening similar measures elsewhere.
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.