- The Chinese Communist Party has initiated a sophisticated cyberattack campaign targeting the US and its allies, raising concerns about the vulnerability of critical infrastructure and national security.
- In 2024, Chinese hackers breached the US Treasury Department and targeted telecom companies. These incidents are part of a broader campaign by Beijing-backed groups aiming to steal intellectual property and conduct strategic espionage.
- The CCP’s cyber aggression is not new. Past incidents include the 2020 RedEcho attack on India’s power grid and the 2024 Salt Typhoon campaign targeting telecom networks. These events highlight the CCP’s willingness to use cyber warfare for geopolitical coercion.
- The Quad alliance—comprising the US, India, Japan, and Australia—has sought to strengthen collective cybersecurity efforts. However, significant gaps remain due to mistrust, asymmetric capabilities, and diverging legal frameworks.
- The CCP’s cyber onslaught poses a clear and present danger to national security. The US and its allies must act swiftly to close vulnerabilities, strengthen defenses, and deter future attacks, requiring technological innovation and a unified strategic vision.
(Natural News)—The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has launched an unprecedented cyberespionage campaign targeting the United States and its allies, raising alarms about the vulnerability of America’s critical infrastructure and national security. As 2025 unfolds, experts warn that Beijing’s cyber capabilities are becoming more sophisticated, with the potential to disrupt everything from power grids to military operations. The stakes could not be higher, and the time for decisive action is now.
A growing threat to national security
In recent weeks, the CCP’s cyberattacks have dominated headlines. On January 8, Japan revealed that over 200 cyberattacks in the past five years were linked to the CCP-backed hacking group MirrorFace. These attacks targeted Japan’s foreign and defense ministries, its space agency and even private companies and think tanks. Meanwhile, in the United States, Chinese hackers breached the Treasury Department’s workstations in December 2024, stealing unclassified documents through a compromised third-party software provider, Beyond Trust.
This breach is just one example of a broader campaign by Beijing-backed groups like Salt Typhoon, which has targeted nine major telecom companies, including Verizon, AT&T and Lumen Technologies. Jen Easterly, director of the U.S. Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA), warned in a January 15 blog post that a crisis in Asia—such as an invasion of Taiwan—could trigger devastating cyberattacks on U.S. infrastructure. “Everything, everywhere, all at once,” she wrote, could be hit, from transportation nodes to power grids and water facilities.
The CCP’s goal, according to Easterly, is clear: to induce societal panic and undermine America’s ability to defend its interests abroad. Neehar Pathare, CEO of cybersecurity firm 63SATS, echoed this sentiment, stating, “China’s state-affiliated cyber operations focus on intellectual property theft and strategic espionage, aiming for long-term access.”
Historical context: A pattern of aggression
The CCP’s cyber aggression is not new. In 2020, the hacking group RedEcho, linked to Chinese military intelligence, targeted India’s power grid following the deadly Galwan Valley clash between Indian and Chinese troops. This attack highlighted Beijing’s willingness to use cyber warfare as a tool of geopolitical coercion.
Similarly, the 2024 Salt Typhoon campaign demonstrated the CCP’s ability to infiltrate global telecommunications networks, accessing private texts and phone conversations of Americans. The FBI and CISA have urged telecom companies to bolster their security, but the true scale of the breach remains unknown. Jeff Greene, CISA’s executive assistant director for cybersecurity, admitted, “We don’t have any illusion that once we kick off these actors they’re not going to come back.”
These incidents are part of a broader pattern of Chinese cyber aggression. According to Microsoft’s 2024 Digital Defense Report, 33% of CCP cyber activity targets the United States, with East Asia and the Pacific bearing the brunt of the remaining attacks. Nishakant Ojha, a senior adviser to the Global Policy Institute, warned that China’s integration of artificial intelligence into its cyber operations will only enhance its capabilities in 2025.
The Quad’s response: A fragile alliance
In response to these threats, the Quad alliance—comprising the United States, India, Japan and Australia—has sought to strengthen its collective cybersecurity efforts. The Quad’s 2024 summit emphasized the need to protect critical infrastructure and coordinate responses to cyber incidents. However, significant gaps remain.
Ojha pointed out that historical mistrust, asymmetric cyber capabilities and diverging legal frameworks hinder effective collaboration. “Addressing these bottlenecks requires building mutual trust, harmonizing legal frameworks and fostering equitable technological collaboration,” he said.
Despite these challenges, the Quad has made progress. The alliance’s “cyber challenge” initiative, launched in 2023, aims to promote cybersecurity education and workforce development across the Indo-Pacific. Satoru Nagao, a nonresident fellow at the Hudson Institute, noted that cyber cooperation has wider potential, including software development and cyberwarfare.
A call to action
The CCP’s cyber onslaught is a clear and present danger to America’s national security. As Beijing continues to refine its cyber capabilities, the United States and its allies must act swiftly to close vulnerabilities, strengthen defenses and deter future attacks. This requires not only technological innovation but also a unified strategic vision among Quad nations. In addition to China, Russia, Iran and North Korea pose significant cyber threats to the West as well.
The lessons of history are clear: complacency in the face of cyber threats invites disaster. From the RedEcho attacks on India’s power grid to the Salt Typhoon campaign targeting U.S. telecom networks, the CCP has demonstrated its willingness to exploit cyber vulnerabilities for geopolitical gain. The time for half-measures is over. America must lead the charge in securing its digital future—before it’s too late.
As Easterly aptly warned, the CCP’s cyber program is “sophisticated and well-resourced.” The question is: Are we prepared to meet the challenge? The answer will determine the fate of our nation’s security and sovereignty in the digital age.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Two Storms, One Harvest
Every food crisis in living memory has been a one-shock event. The 2008 price spike was a commodity bubble. The 2020 shortages were a logistics failure. The 2022 grain scare was a war on one exporter’s ports. Each time, the system bent, adjusted, and recovered, and each time the experts assured us afterward that global markets are simply too big and too diversified to fail.
What nobody in Washington seems eager to discuss is that 2026 is shaping up to be something the modern food system has never actually faced. Two independent shocks, one climatic and one geopolitical, are converging on the same harvest cycle at the same time. Not sequentially. Simultaneously.
Start with the weather. The Pacific Ocean is currently building toward what forecasters now openly call a record event. NOAA’s Climate Prediction Center puts the odds of at least a strong El Niño near 88 percent, with roughly two in three odds it reaches “very strong” status, the tier reserved for perhaps three or four events in the entire satellite era. Every major global model now projects a median peak in Super El Niño territory, and most of them project it exceeding the 2015-16 event, which until now held the modern record. Sea surface anomalies were already brushing the super threshold in mid-July, months before these events normally peak. The atmosphere has already shifted into El Niño mode, and the event is forecast to crest in late fall and early winter.
This is not about “climate change.” It’s about the standard cycles of weather, and the cycle we’re currently in is one that has likely devastated societies in the past. We’re better prepared as a society today, but not all Americans are equally prepared.
Serious households have started doing the quiet math on their own. Grocery bills tell part of the story, and the forecast maps tell the rest, which is why long-term food storage has moved from fringe hobby to mainstream line item in the family budget, with established suppliers like Heaven’s Harvest seeing demand from people who five years ago would have rolled their eyes at the idea. That instinct is not paranoia. It is pattern recognition, and the pattern is worth walking through carefully.
Editor’s Note: Heaven’s Harvest IS a sponsor, but the warnings of this article are real and would be written even if we didn’t have a survival food sponsor. With that said, those who take advantage of what they offer can use promo code “Patriot” for 15% off.
The Fertilizer Clock Is Already Running
While the Pacific warms, the second shock has been unfolding in the Strait of Hormuz. The conflict with Iran turned the world’s most important energy chokepoint into a contested waterway, and the consequences reach far beyond the gas pump. Roughly a third of global fertilizer trade moves through Hormuz, and the disruption sent urea prices up 86 percent year over year by March, with a 53 percent jump in a single month.
The World Bank projects energy prices rising about 24 percent in 2026 and fertilizer about 31 percent. By its own accounting, fertilizer prices ran 35 percent higher in the first five months of this year than the same period last year.
Here is the mechanism the nightly news will not explain. Fertilizer is not a grocery item. It is a time-delayed input. The nitrogen a farmer in Iowa or Punjab could not afford to apply this spring does not show up as a problem this spring. It shows up as a thinner harvest six to twelve months later.
The World Bank’s own food security brief concedes that the effects of reduced applications earlier this season “are likely to become visible only later in harvest outcomes.” Translate that from institutional language into plain English and it means this. The damage is already done, it is already in the ground, and we are simply waiting for it to arrive on the shelf.
Now check the calendar. Six to twelve months from the spring planting season lands us squarely in late 2026 and early 2027. Which is precisely when the strongest El Niño in the instrumental record is forecast to peak, bringing its signature droughts to Southeast Asia, Australia, southern Africa, northern Brazil, and South Asia, the very regions that grow the world’s rice, sugar, and oilseeds.
The World Bank warns openly that a strong El Niño “could disrupt multiple crop belts simultaneously” on top of the conflict-driven input costs. Their baseline projection assumes the Middle East disruptions ease by autumn. What in the last two years of Middle East history suggests that assumption is safe?
The System Has No Slack Left
The comfortable answer is that global markets always adjust. But adjustment requires slack, and the slack is gone. Global cereal production is expected to decline from last year’s records even before El Niño does its work. The UN World Food Programme, hardly a den of right-wing preppers, is calling this the most significant disruption to its supply chains since Covid and the invasion of Ukraine, and its supply chain director put the stakes bluntly.
Today’s supply chain challenges are tomorrow’s hunger crisis.
There is also a political dimension that markets cannot price. When food gets scarce, governments do not behave like economists. They behave like politicians. Export bans, hoarding mandates, and panic buying at the national level turned the modest rice shortfall of 2008 into a global crisis, and analysts are already warning that import-dependent nations are the first dominoes.
The 2015-16 Super El Niño, a far weaker event than what is now forecast, threw tens of millions into food stress across Africa and Asia. This one is projected to be stronger, and it arrives with fertilizer already rationed by price and shipping lanes already contested by missiles.
What Joseph Knew
Scripture does not treat preparation for lean years as faithlessness. It treats it as wisdom delivered in advance to those willing to act on it.
Behold, there come seven years of great plenty throughout all the land of Egypt: And there shall arise after them seven years of famine; and all the plenty shall be forgotten in the land of Egypt.
Joseph did not respond to that warning with a hashtag or a committee. He stored grain during the years of abundance, and when the famine came, Egypt stood while its neighbors begged. The lesson is not that famine is certain. It is that the time to prepare is precisely when preparation still looks optional.
Nobody who filled a pantry in a year of plenty has ever regretted it, and nobody standing in an empty aisle has ever been glad he waited for certainty.
None of this calls for panic, and panic is the enemy of sound judgment anyway. It calls for the same unglamorous prudence our grandparents considered ordinary. Keep some cash margin, know your local growers, and put real food in deep storage while it is cheap and available, because the entire arc of this story is that cheap and available is a closing window.
Families looking for a straightforward place to start can visit Heaven’s Harvest and use promo code Patriot for 15 percent off long-term storable food. The forecasts may yet soften, the strait may yet reopen, and we should pray they do. But hope is a fine thing to hold and a foolish thing to eat.