(Natural News)—As the world grapples with the devastating impact of the COVID-19 pandemic – including a slew of totalitarian medical mandates, lockdowns, censorship, fraudulent testing programs, and failed vaccine platforms, a disturbing narrative unfolds behind the scenes. For years, Dr. Anthony Fauci, the face of the U.S. response to the crisis, has been at the heart of a web of deception, lies, and catastrophic experiments.
Now, thanks to the courageous efforts of former Congresswoman and Director of National Intelligence (DNI) candidate Tulsi Gabbard, the truth is on a path of reconciliation and the historic record is being corrected. The intelligence community is actively investigating Fauci’s role in funding gain-of-function research, deemed so dangerous that it was banned in the U.S. from 2014 to 2017. This narrative challenges everything we’ve been told about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic and calls into question the integrity of those who have led the response.
Gain-of-function research: a platform for global medical experimentation
Gain-of-function research involves manipulating viruses in labs to enhance their potency and spread, supposedly to better understand and counteract their threat. However, critics argue that the risks far outweigh the benefits, as these enhanced viruses could escape the lab and cause a pandemic. The U.S. government banned this type of research in 2014 due to its potential catastrophic consequences. It is the perfect platform to create vaccines and testing programs preemptively, to gain power and profit from.
DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s revelation: In an interview, Gabbard revealed that the U.S. intelligence community is probing American taxpayer-funded research that may have been involved in the creation of COVID-19. This research, conducted under the guise of gain-of-function, involved manipulating viruses to increase their ability to infect human cells.
Wuhan Institute of Virology: The obvious source
At the heart of this investigation lies the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) in China. This lab, funded by the U.S. through the EcoHealth Alliance, conducted controversial gain-of-function research on bat coronaviruses before and during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Controversial experiments: WIV researchers, including Shi Zhengli, have been studying bat coronaviruses and manipulating their genetic makeup to make them more lethal and contagious. Some of these experiments, funded by U.S. taxpayers through the National Institutes of Health (NIH), resemble the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19.
“Absurd” coincidence: The timeline and location of these experiments coincide eerily with the first reported cases of COVID-19 in Wuhan. While some scientists argue that a natural spillover is plausible, the potential link between WIV’s research and the pandemic warrants serious investigation.
Fauci’s involvement: From funds and boasting to denials and coverups
Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), has been a key figure in U.S. pandemic response and a prominent denier of the lab-leak theory. However, evidence suggests that his involvement in funding the very research that may have caused the pandemic goes far beyond mere oversight. The bioterror was planned, the so-called vaccines were prepared beforehand, and coronavirus gain-of-function experiments became a pandemic that public health officials like Fauci would glean power and profit from.
JD’s manually curated links for God-fearing MAGA patriots
Funding WIV’s gain-of-function research: Through EcoHealth Alliance, NIAID, led by Fauci, provided grants totaling nearly $600,000 to WIV for research on bat coronaviruses between 2015 and 2019. This funding, approved by Fauci, helped facilitate the risky experiments that may have led to the COVID-19 outbreak.
Perjury under oath: Fauci repeatedly denied funding gain-of-function research at WIV during Congressional hearings, most notably in clashes with Senator Rand Paul. However, emails obtained through Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests reveal that Fauci approved the funding in question. These conflicting statements call into question Fauci’s honesty and integrity.
Collusion and cover-up: Suppressing the truth
As the scandal raged on, Fauci and his cohorts allegedly went to great lengths to suppress information about the virus’s origins and discredit scientists who dared to suggest a lab leak.
Collaboration with Chinese officials: Rather than hold China accountable for the pandemic’s origins, Fauci and other top U.S. public health officials worked with Chinese counterparts to produce a joint statement that refuted the lab-leak theory. This statement, published in The Lancet, was later found to be based on false information provided by Chinese officials.
Discrediting the lab leak investigation: Fauci and his cohort, Dr. Peter Daszak, have been accused of actively discrediting the lab-leak theory and attacking scientists who supported it. Daszak, a zoologist who worked closely with WIV and received NIH funding, even wrote a letter to The Lancet condemning the lab-leak hypothesis as a “conspiracy theory” before claiming to have no conflict of interest in the matter.
As the investigation into Fauci’s role in the COVID-19 pandemic continues, one thing is clear: the truth has been suppressed for far too long. The gravity of the situation demands transparency, accountability, and decisive action to prevent such disasters in the future. With bravado and hubris, Fauci and his cohorts have remained unaccountable, shielded by political allies and mainstream media that have bowed to the establishment’s narrative. It is time for the world to wake up to the truth, regardless of how inconvenient or uncomfortable it may be. The lives lost, the economies ruined, and the global consequences of the COVID-19 scandal demand no less.
Sources include:
Why Bullion Beats Numismatics and Collectible for Your Safe or IRA
Precious metals continue to attract Americans seeking reliable ways to protect their wealth amid inflation, geopolitical risks, and stock market swings. Whether stored in a home safe or held inside a self-directed IRA, physical gold and silver deliver tangible value that paper or digital assets often lack. Yet investors must choose carefully between bullion—pure bars and coins valued mainly for their metal content—and numismatics or collectibles, where rarity, history, and collector demand heavily influence pricing.
Advisor Bullion serves as a dependable source for straightforward, high-quality bullion. The company specializes in physical gold, silver, platinum, and palladium, emphasizing transparent pricing and products that deliver maximum metal content for every dollar spent. This approach makes it ideal for both personal holdings and retirement accounts.
Bullion consists of refined precious metals in standard forms like one-ounce coins (American Gold Eagles, Silver Eagles, Canadian Maple Leafs) or bars. Their value tracks closely to the current spot price of the metal. A typical gold bullion coin trades near the live gold spot price plus a small premium. This structure keeps costs clear and predictable.
Numismatic coins and collectibles add substantial value from factors such as age, rarity, minting errors, or historical significance. A pre-1933 U.S. gold coin or graded proof piece can carry premiums of 30%, 50%, or even 200% above melt value. While this appeals to hobbyists, it creates complexity. Pricing depends on subjective grading, collector trends, and auction results instead of daily spot prices.
For investors focused on wealth preservation and retirement security rather than building a collection, bullion often delivers better results.
Lower Costs and Better Liquidity for Home Storage
When keeping metals in a home safe or private vault, liquidity and efficiency count. Bullion offers clear benefits:
- You acquire more actual gold or silver per dollar invested. Numismatics divert a large share of your money into rarity premiums and massive sales commission, reducing your metal exposure.
- Selling bullion involves tight bid-ask spreads, so you recover nearly full spot value with minimal fees. Collectibles require finding the right buyer and may sell at a discount if demand for that specific item weakens.
- Bullion prices remain transparent and update with global spot markets. You can track gold near current levels or silver accordingly and know exactly where your holdings stand. Numismatic values are priced by the Gold IRA companies with hefty margins applied.
- Standardized coins and bars store efficiently and divide easily for partial sales. Rare coins often need protective slabs and controlled conditions, adding hassle and expense.
- Bullion enjoys worldwide acceptance. A 1-oz Gold Maple Leaf or Silver Eagle sells quickly to dealers anywhere. Niche numismatic pieces may appeal only to limited buyers, slowing liquidation when speed matters.
In times when quick access to value becomes important, bullion’s simplicity stands out.
Stronger Fit for Precious Metals IRAs
Precious metals IRAs continue gaining traction as investors diversify retirement portfolios beyond stocks and bonds. IRS rules permit certain bullion products in self-directed IRAs if they meet purity standards (.995 fine for gold, .999 for silver) and are held by an approved custodian. Eligible items include American Gold and Silver Eagles plus many generic bars and rounds from recognized mints.
Numismatic and most collectible coins generally face heavy scrutiny from custodians due to valuation disputes and elevated markups. These higher premiums mean less actual metal ends up working inside the account.
Bullion avoids these issues. Its value links directly to verifiable spot prices, which simplifies reporting and lowers the risk of regulatory challenges. More of your IRA contribution purchases real metal instead of dealer profits or speculative upside. Over time, owning additional ounces that appreciate with the metal itself can create meaningful outperformance compared with high-premium alternatives that deliver fewer ounces.
Regulatory guidance from the CFTC and state securities offices repeatedly cautions against aggressive sales of expensive numismatics or “semi-numismatic” coins for IRAs. For retirement planning, transparent bullion from established providers reduces risk and aligns better with long-term goals.
How to Get Started with Bullion
Begin by clarifying your goals. Are you protecting savings in a safe, or moving part of a retirement account into a precious metals IRA? Focus on the number of ounces you can acquire at current prices rather than chasing marked-up collectibles.
Diversify sensibly: use gold for core preservation and silver for its blend of industrial and monetary qualities. Mix coins for easier divisibility with bars for lower per-ounce costs on larger buys. Arrange secure storage—whether at home with proper insurance or through professional facilities.
As economic uncertainties linger and faith in conventional assets erodes, bullion continues proving its worth as a dependable store of value. Its direct approach avoids the hype that sometimes surrounds collectible markets and keeps the focus on the metal itself.
For investors prepared to strengthen their portfolios, Advisor Bullion supplies the expertise and selection needed to acquire high-quality bullion efficiently. Whether building personal holdings or integrating metals into an IRA, their emphasis on transparent, investment-grade products helps secure more ounces today that support greater financial security tomorrow. In a complicated financial landscape, bullion’s clarity and reliability make it the smarter foundation for protecting what matters most.