(Zero Hedge)—Speaking at the Munich Security Conference in Washington on Wednesday, U.S. Vice President JD Vance stated that America’s security posture of the past 20 years is no longer sufficient for the challenges of the next two decades. He emphasized the need for the U.S. to rethink and modernize its national defense strategy to address emerging global threats, including a world fracturing into a bipolar state and the weaponization of supply chains by foreign adversaries.
During a question-and-answer session at the Munich Security Conference, Wolfgang Ischinger—the former German ambassador to the U.S. and longtime chair of the conference—asked VP Vance whether the Trump administration sees the U.S. as a continued “European power.”
The vice president’s response reaffirmed that the U.S. and Europe remain fundamentally aligned, describing them as part of the same “civilizational team.” While acknowledging that he’s often labeled a “hyper-realist” focused on transactional foreign policy and emphasized that his view of the U.S.-Europe relationship goes beyond mere interests—highlighting shared cultural and historical ties.
He noted that disagreements are inevitable but stressed the need for transatlantic cooperation, particularly in rethinking defense strategies for the next 20 years, well into the 2030s. Vance also called for greater European burden-sharing, arguing that the current security posture is outdated and must evolve.
Here is Vance’s full, unedited response:
And, yeah, I do still very much think that the United States and Europe are on the same team. And I I think that this is, you know, sometimes I’ve been criticized as a hyper realist, right? I think of foreign policy purely in terms of transactional values.
What does the America get out of it? What do the you know rest of the world get out of it? And and try to you know focus so purely on the transactional value of it that we ignore sometimes the humanitarian or the moral side of it. And I think at least with Europe that’s actually not a full encapsulation of my views because I think that you know European civilization and American civilization, European culture and American culture are very much linked and they’re always going to be linked and I I think it’s it’s completely ridiculous to think that you’re ever going to be able to drive a firm wedge between the United States and Europe.
Now that doesn’t mean we’re not going to have disagreements and of course you know you brought up the speech earlier. It doesn’t mean that Europeans won’t criticize the United States or the United States won’t criticize Europe.
But I do think fundamentally we have to be and we are on the same civilizational team. And I think obviously there’s a big question about what that means in the 21st century. I think you know obviously the president and I believe that it means a little bit more Europe European burden sharing on the defense side. I think that it means that all of us frankly on both sides of the Atlantic have gotten a little bit uh too comfortable with the security posture of the last 20 years and that frankly that security posture is not adequate to meet the challenges of the next 20 years.
So there are a lot of ways in which this alliance will evolve and change in the same way that the alliance evolved and changed from 1945 to 1975 and from 1975 to 2005. I do think that we’re in one of these phases where we’re going to have to rethink a lot of big questions, but I do think that we should rethink those big questions together.
Vance is signaling a pivot in defense policy, suggesting that the post-9/11 era focus on counterterrorism and regional conflicts (like Iraq and Afghanistan) has now pivoted towards state-driven threats, particularly from China, Russia, Iran, and non-traditional domains such as:
- Cyber warfare
- Artificial intelligence
- Space militarization
- Supply chain vulnerabilities
- Nuclear and hypersonic weapons
The worldview that President Trump has is for greater coordination of national and hemispheric defense across the Americas, hence the push for stronger economic integration between the U.S. and Canada, coupled with a hardened defense perimeter stretching from the Arctic to the Panama Canal.
Steve Bannon previously said it’s all about “hemispheric control,” noting that a new era of hemispheric defense across the Americas will begin once Trump delivers peace in Eastern Europe.
JD’s manually curated links for God-fearing MAGA patriots
3/3
“He is going to make a deal with Russia that we can finally counterbalance the CCP and bring peace and then have hemispheric defense here in Europe and Paris. https://t.co/vmJHFnTDlu pic.twitter.com/X3T63GnAJ0— 🐸𝐚𝐦𝐢𝙗™️ (@BonVangUFO) February 19, 2025
Bolstering hemispheric defense may involve President Trump’s proposed “Golden Dome” defense system. A recent Congressional Budget Office report states that developing this missile defense network could cost $542 billion over 20 years.
Arthur Herman recently penned in the National Interest how “pooling US-Canada resources from energy to AI to defense would be a boon for global and hemispheric security.” In other words, a US-Canada “superstate” could emerge in the 2030s that will be enough to handle all the threats the world throws at it.
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.