(Natural News)—While many conspiracies about the Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) have been revealed to be true, one stands out – the fact that a member of the infamous Rothschild family holds the patent for COVID-19 testing.
“It has been reported that … COVID-19 caught the world by surprise in 2020,” wrote 100 Percent Fed Up. “Well, all of us – except the Rothschilds, according to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.”
According to the outlet, a British national named Richard Rothschild was granted a patent for “System and Method for Testing for COVID-19, with a priority date of Oct. 13, 2015 – the date when the patent was first filed. (Related: Patent document shows that DARPA built covid with the help of Bill Gates, WHO.)
Based on the patent’s abstract, the method calls for the use of “a pulse oximeter to acquire at least pulse and blood oxygen saturation percentage.” The oximeter’s readings are then “transmitted wirelessly to a smartphone” equipped with an accelerometer for accuracy.
“Once accurate data is acquired, it is uploaded to the cloud (or host), where the data is used (alone or together with other vital signs) to determine whether the user is suffering from (or likely to suffer from) a viral infection, such as COVID-19,” it continued. “Depending on the specific requirements, the data, changes thereto, and/or the determination can be used to alert medical staff and take corresponding actions.”
Fact-checkers come to the rescue
In October 2020, Reuters published a “fact-check” piece about the matter, describing the patent as a “false claim.” The outlet mentioned that the 2015 priority date serves as “evidence that the [COVID-19] pandemic has been planned.”
However, it quickly went on defensive mode by noting that the patent for such a system was not applied for until May 2020. Reuters also alleged that the individual who disclosed the Rothschild patent has conflated the definition of “priority date” and “application date.”
“The priority date can refer to the earliest filing date in a family of related patent applications or the earliest filing date of a particular feature of an invention. In this case, Oct. 13, 2015 is when Rothschild first made a provisional application within this family of patents.”
Moreover, Reuters disclosed that a separate patent for a “System and Method for Using, Biometric, and Displaying Biometric Data” was filed in April 2017. The outlet ultimately deemed the claim as false, explaining that “the year 2015 was when Rothschild first filed a provisional application within the family of patents. The year 2017 is the filing date of a related, but separate patent within the family.”
While the identity of the 2015 patent holder remains a mystery, his British lineage can possibly be traced to the family of Nathan Mayer Rothschild. The patriarch of the English branch of the Rothschild banking family was sent to the United Kingdom by his father, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, to establish a presence there.
Head over to Conspiracy.news for more stories like this. Watch this video that explains why everything in the U.S. since the year 1492 has been a Rothschild-related scam.
This video is from the 5Slampig channel on Brighteon.com.
More related stories:
- Health experts claim U.S. military has been secretly controlling Australia’s health institutions and COVID-19 vaccine rollout plans.
- BE AFRAID: Global health experts claim next pandemic could be up to 20 TIMES DEADLIER than COVID-19.
- California’s population numbers drop to 2015 pre-COVID levels as EXCESS DEATHS soar.
- Fauci’s former top deputy caught deleting correspondence on COVID-19 origins.
- Whistleblower: CIA BRIBED analysts to change their findings on COVID-19 origins.
Sources include:
Bypass Big Tech Censors
Safeguarding Your American Dream: Discover the Power of America First Healthcare
In today’s economy, healthcare costs remain one of the biggest threats to financial stability and family security. Americans work hard to build a better life, yet rising medical expenses can quickly erode savings, force tough trade-offs, and even push families toward debt or bankruptcy. Medical bills continue to rank as the leading cause of personal bankruptcy in the United States, with millions facing underinsurance or unexpected out-of-pocket burdens that no one plans for. Many turn to government-run marketplace plans under the Affordable Care Act, hoping for relief, only to discover that what appears affordable on paper often delivers higher long-term costs, limited real protection, and coverage that may not align with personal values or family needs.
America First Healthcare stands out as a private insurance agency dedicated to helping conservatives and families secure better coverage and better rates through customized, values-aligned options. By conducting free insurance reviews, the agency uncovers hidden gaps in existing policies and connects clients with private alternatives that emphasize personal responsibility, small-government principles, and genuine affordability—often delivering up to 20% savings while providing stronger protection for the American Dream.
The allure of marketplace plans is easy to understand: open enrollment periods, premium tax credits for many households, and the promise of “comprehensive” benefits mandated by law. Yet recent data reveals a different reality, especially after the expiration of enhanced premium subsidies at the end of 2025. Enrollment for 2026 dropped by more than one million people compared to the prior year, with many shifting to lower-tier bronze plans to keep monthly premiums manageable.
These plans feature significantly higher deductibles—averaging around $7,500 nationally—and greater cost-sharing requirements. Families who once paid modest amounts after subsidies now face average premium increases of $65 or more per month, even as they accept plans that leave them responsible for thousands in upfront costs before meaningful coverage kicks in.
High deductibles create a dangerous barrier to care. Studies show that people in such plans are less likely to seek timely treatment for chronic conditions, attend preventive screenings, or fill necessary prescriptions. A seemingly minor illness or injury can balloon into major expenses when patients delay care until problems worsen. For a family of four, a single hospitalization, cancer diagnosis, or unexpected surgery can easily exceed the deductible, triggering coinsurance and out-of-pocket maximums that still leave substantial bills. One recent analysis noted that some proposed changes could push family deductibles toward $31,000 in future years, further exposing households to financial risk.
Beyond the numbers, marketplace plans often carry structural limitations. Coverage for certain critical services may include waiting periods or narrower networks that restrict access to preferred doctors and specialists. Preventive care is required to be covered without cost-sharing, but everything else—lab work, imaging, specialist visits, or ongoing treatment—typically waits until the deductible is met. This reactive model contrasts sharply with the proactive, holistic approach many families prefer, especially those focused on wellness, early intervention, and maintaining health to enjoy life rather than merely reacting to illness.
Values alignment represents another growing concern. Government-influenced plans operate within a framework shaped by federal mandates and political priorities that may not reflect conservative principles of limited government, personal freedom, and ethical stewardship. Families who want to direct their healthcare dollars toward providers and benefits that honor traditional values sometimes find marketplace options feel misaligned, forcing a compromise between affordability and conviction.
Private alternatives, by contrast, offer year-round flexibility without the restrictions of open enrollment windows. Independent agents can shop across a wider range of carriers to design plans tailored to specific family needs—whether that means lower deductibles for frequent medical users, broader provider networks, or add-ons that support wellness and preventive services from day one. Clients frequently report more stable premiums that do not automatically escalate each year, along with genuine cost savings once the full picture of deductibles, copays, and coverage depth is considered.
Take the experience of real families who made the switch. Amanda C. shared that her new plan felt “way better” than what she had through the marketplace. Johnny Y. noted his previous coverage kept increasing annually until he found a more stable private option. Sofia S. expressed delight with her plan and began recommending it to others. These stories echo a common theme: when families move beyond one-size-fits-all government marketplaces, they often discover customized protection that better safeguards both health and finances.
Founder Jordan Sarmiento’s own journey underscores the stakes. In 2021, a six-day hospitalization generated a $95,000 bill. Under a well-structured private “Conservative Care Coverage” plan, his out-of-pocket responsibility would have been just $500. That stark difference illustrates how thoughtful planning and private options can prevent a medical event from becoming a financial catastrophe.
Practical steps exist for anyone questioning their current coverage. Start with a no-obligation review of your existing policy to identify gaps—high deductibles, limited critical-care benefits, or escalating premiums. Compare total projected costs (premiums plus potential out-of-pocket expenses) rather than monthly premiums alone. Consider family health history, anticipated needs, and lifestyle priorities. Private agencies can present side-by-side options that include stronger wellness incentives, broader access, and plans built on shared values of self-reliance and freedom.
In an era when healthcare inflation continues to outpace general cost-of-living increases, relying solely on marketplace solutions carries growing risk. Families who proactively explore private alternatives frequently achieve meaningful savings while gaining peace of mind that their coverage truly works when needed most.
America First Healthcare makes this exploration straightforward through its free review process. Families and individuals receive personalized guidance to close coverage holes, reduce unnecessary expenses, and secure plans that align with conservative principles—protecting wallets, health, and the American Dream without government overreach. Many who complete a review discover they can enjoy better benefits for less, often saving up to 20% while gaining the customization and stability that marketplace plans struggle to deliver.
Ultimately, protecting your family’s future requires looking beyond the marketing of “affordable” government options. By understanding the long-term costs hidden in high deductibles, shifting coverage tiers, and values mismatches, Americans can make empowered choices. Private, values-driven insurance offers a smarter path—one that rewards diligence, supports wellness, and delivers real security. For those ready to move beyond the limitations of traditional marketplace plans, a simple review can reveal options designed to serve families, not bureaucracies. The American Dream thrives when individuals and families retain control over their healthcare decisions, and thoughtful private coverage plays a vital role in making that possible.


